Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
LQD vs MTUM: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, LQD returned −3.4% to MTUM's +18.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about LQD and MTUM
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $30.6bn for iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF and $18.7bn for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF.
Pair scorecard
LQD costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 21.8 points; LQD is 1.6 times larger.
| Measure | LQD | MTUM |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −3.4% | +18.4% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 6.3%, high on Sep 22, 2021 | 11.9%, high on Jun 22, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade Index | MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.14% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $30.6bn | $18.7bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 93% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 35.5% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, LQD and MTUM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
LQD and MTUM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
LQD
LQD tracks an index of US investment grade bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −3.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year. It sat 6.3% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Oct 28, 2026.
MTUM
MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 126 positions, with the top ten at 35.5%. It sat 11.9% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, LQD or MTUM?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, LQD returned −3.4% and MTUM +18.4%.
- Which is cheaper, LQD or MTUM?
- LQD is cheaper, by 0.01 percentage points a year. That is about $1 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, LQD against MTUM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/lqd-vs-mtum
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). LQD against MTUM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/lqd-vs-mtum
[LQD against MTUM (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/lqd-vs-mtum)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.