GSST vs IBTH: Differences, Returns & Fees
GSST's duration was 0.5 years on May 31, 2026 and IBTH's 0.9 on Jul 31, 2026; IBTH charges 0.07% to GSST's 0.16%. Net assets: $1.7bn on Oct 19, 2026 for Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF, and $2.4bn on Oct 20, 2026 for iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Treasury ETF.
IBTH costs 0.09 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.1 points; IBTH is 1.4 times larger.
| GSST | IBTH | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.16% | 0.07% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 19, 2026 | $1.7bn | $2.4bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.9% | +2.8% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | ICE 2027 Maturity US Treasury Index |
| Holdings in common | report dates differ | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
GSST and IBTH are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. GSST follows No index, actively managed and IBTH follows ICE 2027 Maturity US Treasury Index.
- Number of holdings. GSST holds 357 positions and IBTH holds 51.
- One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 GSST returned +3.9% and IBTH +2.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 1.1 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
On the same fields
GSST and IBTH on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About GSST
GSST is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.16% a year.
About IBTH
IBTH tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, GSST or IBTH?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GSST returned +3.9% and IBTH +2.8%.
- Which is cheaper, GSST or IBTH?
- IBTH is cheaper, by 0.09 percentage points a year. That is about $9 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, GSST against IBTH, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gsst-vs-ibth
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). GSST against IBTH. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gsst-vs-ibth
[GSST against IBTH (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gsst-vs-ibth)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.