Which returned more over the last year, GLDM or NOBL?

In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GLDM returned +2.8% and NOBL +15.5%.

Which is cheaper, GLDM or NOBL?

GLDM is cheaper, by 0.25 percentage points a year. That is about $25 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Across categories

GLDM vs NOBL: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share on X Download as PDF

GLDM is a commodity fund and NOBL an equity index fund, and over the year to Oct 28, 2026, NOBL returned +15.5% against +2.8%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about GLDM and NOBL

Net assets: $30.6bn on Oct 27, 2026 for SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust, and $11.6bn on Oct 28, 2026 for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF.

GLDM on its own →NOBL on its own →

At a glance

+2.8%

GLDM total return, 1 year

+15.5%

NOBL total return, 1 year

0.10%

GLDM expense ratio

0.35%

NOBL expense ratio

Pair scorecard

GLDM costs 0.25 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.7 points; GLDM is 2.6 times larger.

GLDM vs NOBL: Differences, Returns & Fees
Measure	GLDM	NOBL
Return
Measure	GLDM	NOBL
Total return, 1 year	+2.8%	+15.5%
Drawdown
Measure	GLDM	NOBL
Below its high	24.5%, high on Jan 29, 2026
Benchmark
Measure	GLDM	NOBL
What it tracks	Gold	S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index
Cost and size
Measure	GLDM	NOBL
Expense ratio	0.10%	0.35%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026	$30.6bn	$11.7bn
Holdings
Measure	GLDM	NOBL
Holdings in common	not published
In the S&P 500, by weight		98%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund		17.0%

Method

Side by side

GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

Where it sits Commodity ETF Stock ETF

Issuer State Street ProShares

What it is Holds gold Tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats

Total return, 1 year +2.8% +15.5%

Its benchmark over the same days +2.5% (GLD) not measured

Gap to its benchmark +0.3 pts vs GLD not measured

Expense ratio 0.10% 0.35%

Holdings not counted 69

Net assets, GLDM as of Oct 27, 2026 and NOBL as of Oct 28, 2026 $30.6bn $11.6bn

GLDM and NOBL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

About each fund

GLDM

Its expense ratio is 0.10% a year, for the three months to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-Q states.

GLDM holds gold. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +2.5% for its benchmark, the price of gold. It sat 24.5% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

NOBL

NOBL tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 17.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GLDM or NOBL?: In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GLDM returned +2.8% and NOBL +15.5%.
Which is cheaper, GLDM or NOBL?: GLDM is cheaper, by 0.25 percentage points a year. That is about $25 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.

Other comparisons

GLDM vs RSP GLDM vs SDY GLDM vs VOE COWZ vs GLDM IAU vs NOBL NOBL vs USO NOBL vs SLV NOBL vs SIVR

Where to next

GLDM on its own →NOBL on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →NOBL dividend history →NOBL holdings →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

State Street website ↗

NOBL filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

NOBL prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

ProShares page for NOBL ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GLDM against NOBL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gldm-vs-nobl

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.