Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

GLD vs IAU: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

GLD and IAU are both commodity funds, and over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IAU returned +2.7% against +2.5%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about GLD and IAU

Net assets: $135.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for SPDR Gold Shares, and $60.1bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Gold Trust.

At a glance
+2.5%
GLD total return, 1 year
+2.7%
IAU total return, 1 year
0.40%
GLD expense ratio
0.25%
IAU expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IAU costs 0.15 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.2 points; GLD is 2.3 times larger.

GLD vs IAU: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureGLDIAU
Return
Total return, 1 year+2.5%+2.7%
Drawdown
Below its high24.7%, high on Jan 29, 202624.6%, high on Jan 29, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksGoldGold
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.40%0.25%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$135.8bn$60.3bn
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published

Method

Risk and return

Feb 4, 2005 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,133 weekly returns
GLD IAU
Return
Total return edge IAU (slight) +784.0% +805.4%
Annualized edge Tie +10.5% +10.6%
Price return edge IAU (slight) +784.0% +805.4%
Risk
Volatility edge Tie 17.3% 17.4%
Max drawdown edge Tie −44.7% −44.4%
Downside capture 99.9% 100.0%
Beta 1.00 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge Tie 0.56 0.56
Sortino edge Tie 0.82 0.82
Treynor 0.097 0.098
Calmar edge Tie 0.24 0.24
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.1% a year +0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.57 0.67
Information ratio −0.18 0.18
Tracking error 0.7% 0.7%

Each against its own benchmark: GLD against IAU, Feb 4, 2005 to Oct 23, 2026; IAU against GLD, Feb 4, 2005 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

IAU returned slightly more: +805.4% to +784.0%. GLD and IAU swung about the same: 17.3% and 17.4%. GLD and IAU fell about the same at their worst: −44.7% and −44.4%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: GLD vs IAU: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureGLDIAUEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+784.0%+805.4%IAU (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+10.5%+10.6%TieTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+784.0%+805.4%IAU (slight)Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility17.3%17.4%TieSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation11.9%11.9%TieLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−44.7%−44.4%TieDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture99.4%100.4%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture99.9%100.0%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.001.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.001.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.560.56TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.820.82TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0970.098Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.240.24TieAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIAUGLDThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.1% a year+0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.570.67Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.4% to +0.2%−0.2% to +0.4%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.180.18Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error0.7%0.7%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,133 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

Side by side

GLD SPDR Gold Shares IAU iShares Gold Trust
Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF
What it is Holds gold Holds gold
Total return, 1 year +2.5% +2.7%
Its benchmark over the same days +2.7% (IAU) +2.5% (GLD)
Gap to its benchmark −0.2 pts vs IAU +0.2 pts vs GLD
Expense ratio 0.40% 0.25%
Net assets, GLD as of Oct 27, 2026 and IAU as of Oct 28, 2026 $135.8bn $60.1bn

GLD and IAU on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-2E3A16829F

GLD and IAU are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. Cost. GLD charges 0.40% of assets a year and IAU 0.25%, a gap of 0.15 points.
  2. What each follows (similar). Both follow Gold.
  3. One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 GLD returned +2.5% and IAU +2.7% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 0.2 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

GLD and IAU flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
GLD

Its expense ratio is 0.40% a year, for the three months to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-Q states.

GLD holds gold. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.5% with distributions reinvested, against +2.7% for its benchmark, the price of gold. It sat 24.7% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

IAU

Its expense ratio is 0.25% a year, for the three months to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-Q states.

IAU holds gold. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.7% with distributions reinvested, against +2.5% for its benchmark, the price of gold. It sat 24.6% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GLD or IAU?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GLD returned +2.5% and IAU +2.7%.
Which is cheaper, GLD or IAU?
IAU is cheaper, by 0.15 percentage points a year. That is about $15 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GLD against IAU, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gld-vs-iau

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.