Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
GLD vs GLDM: Differences, Returns & Fees
GLD and GLDM are both commodity funds, and over the year to Oct 28, 2026, GLDM returned +2.8% against +2.5%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about GLD and GLDMNet assets on Oct 27, 2026: $135.8bn for SPDR Gold Shares and $30.6bn for SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust.
Pair scorecard
GLDM costs 0.30 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.3 points; GLD is 4.4 times larger.
| Measure | GLD | GLDM |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +2.5% | +2.8% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 24.7%, high on Jan 29, 2026 | 24.5%, high on Jan 29, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Gold | Gold |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.40% | 0.10% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $135.8bn | $30.6bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Risk and return
Jul 6, 2018 to Oct 23, 2026 · 433 weekly returnsEach against its own benchmark: GLD against IAU, Feb 4, 2005 to Oct 23, 2026; GLDM against GLD, Jul 6, 2018 to Oct 23, 2026.
GLDM returned slightly more: +215.1% to +208.4%. GLD and GLDM swung about the same: 16.1% and 16.0%. GLD and GLDM fell about the same at their worst: −24.2% and −24.0%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | GLD | GLDM | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +208.4% | +215.1% | GLDM (slight) | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +14.5% | +14.8% | Tie | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +208.4% | +215.1% | GLDM (slight) | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 16.1% | 16.0% | Tie | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 10.6% | 10.5% | Tie | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −24.2% | −24.0% | Tie | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 99.4% | 100.0% | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 99.9% | 99.6% | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. | |
| Beta | 1.00 | 1.00 | Not an edge | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 1.00 | 1.00 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.75 | 0.77 | GLDM (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.14 | 1.17 | GLDM (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | 0.097 | 0.123 | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. | |
| Calmar | 0.60 | 0.62 | GLDM (slight) | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | ||||
| Benchmark | IAU | GLD | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | −0.1% a year | +0.3% a year | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | −0.57 | 1.42 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. |
| Alpha range | −0.4% to +0.2% | −0.1% to +0.7% | Includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. |
| Information ratio | −0.18 | 0.43 | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 0.7% | 0.6% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 433 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
Side by side
GLD and GLDM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GLD and GLDM are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Cost. GLD charges 0.40% of assets a year and GLDM 0.10%, a gap of 0.30 points.
- Size. GLD has $135.8bn in net assets and GLDM $30.6bn (net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026); GLD is 4.4 times larger.
- What each follows (similar). Both follow Gold.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Its expense ratio is 0.40% a year, for the three months to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-Q states.
GLD holds gold. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.5% with distributions reinvested, against +2.7% for its benchmark, the price of gold. It sat 24.7% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Its expense ratio is 0.10% a year, for the three months to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-Q states.
GLDM holds gold. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +2.5% for its benchmark, the price of gold. It sat 24.5% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, GLD or GLDM?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GLD returned +2.5% and GLDM +2.8%.
- Which is cheaper, GLD or GLDM?
- GLDM is cheaper, by 0.30 percentage points a year. That is about $30 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, GLD against GLDM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gld-vs-gldm
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). GLD against GLDM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gld-vs-gldm
[GLD against GLDM (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gld-vs-gldm)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.