GGOV vs IAGG: Differences, Returns & Fees
On Jul 31, 2026 GGOV's duration was 5.2 years and IAGG's 5.9; IAGG charges 0.07% to GGOV's 0.39%. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $4.2bn for iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF and $12.6bn for iShares Core International Aggregate Bond ETF.
IAGG costs 0.32 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.7 points; IAGG is 3.0 times larger.
| GGOV | IAGG | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.07% |
| Net assets | $4.2bn | $12.6bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.0% | +0.3% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex USD 10% Issuer Capped (Hedged) Index |
| Holdings in common | 17% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.
GGOV and IAGG are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. GGOV follows No index, actively managed and IAGG follows Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex USD 10% Issuer Capped (Hedged) Index.
- Holdings in common. 17% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 GGOV returned +3.0% and IAGG +0.3% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 2.7 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, GGOV and IAGG hold 17% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.
half
17% in common
On the same fields
GGOV and IAGG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About GGOV
GGOV is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year.
About IAGG
IAGG tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +0.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, GGOV or IAGG?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GGOV returned +3.0% and IAGG +0.3%.
- Which is cheaper, GGOV or IAGG?
- IAGG is cheaper, by 0.32 percentage points a year. That is about $32 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, GGOV against IAGG, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ggov-vs-iagg
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). GGOV against IAGG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ggov-vs-iagg
[GGOV against IAGG (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ggov-vs-iagg)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.