A
vs
B
Share
Compare their flowsAsk IQ about these two funds

GBIL vs IBDS: Differences, Returns & Fees

GBIL's duration was 0.4 years on May 31, 2026 and IBDS's 0.8 on Jul 31, 2026; IBDS charges 0.10% to GBIL's 0.12%. Net assets: $7.9bn on Oct 19, 2026 for Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF, and $4.0bn on Oct 20, 2026 for iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Corporate ETF.

Ask IQ about this page

Ask IQ about GBIL and IBDS

Answers cite the figures on this page.

IBDS costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.3 points; GBIL is 2.0 times larger.

GBIL vs IBDS: Differences, Returns & Fees
GBILIBDS
Expense ratio0.12%0.10%
Net assets, as of Oct 19, 2026$7.9bn$4.0bn
Total return, 1 year+3.6%+3.3%
What it tracksnot read by ETFIQnot read by ETFIQ
Holdings in commonreport dates differ

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

+3.6%
GBIL total return, 1 year
+3.3%
IBDS total return, 1 year
0.12%
GBIL expense ratio
0.10%
IBDS expense ratio

Get IBDS's fund flows by email, every Monday.

Plus the Friday ETF note. Confirm from the link that arrives, and unsubscribe in one click. See Privacy.

Client brief · page 1 of 2Report BR-998175B0E6

GBIL and IBDS are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. Number of holdings. GBIL holds 43 positions and IBDS holds 647.
  2. What each follows (similar). Both follow not read by ETFIQ.
  3. One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 GBIL returned +3.6% and IBDS +3.3% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 0.3 points.

Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.

Take this comparison to a client

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.

On the same fields

GBIL
Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF
IBDS
iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Corporate ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
Issuer Goldman Sachs iShares
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +3.6% +3.3%
Expense ratio 0.12% 0.10%
Holdings 43 647
Net assets, GBIL as of Oct 19, 2026 and IBDS as of Oct 20, 2026 $7.9bn $4.0bn

GBIL and IBDS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About GBIL

GBIL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.12% a year.

About IBDS

IBDS tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GBIL or IBDS?
In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GBIL returned +3.6% and IBDS +3.3%.
Which is cheaper, GBIL or IBDS?
IBDS is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. That is about $2 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
GBIL vs GSYBILS vs GBILGBIL vs IBDRGBIL vs TFLOIBDS vs PULSIBDS vs SHVIBDS vs IBTGGSST vs IBDS
GBIL on its own →IBDS on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →GBIL dividend history →GBIL holdings →IBDS dividend history →IBDS holdings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
GBIL filings on SEC EDGAR ↗GBIL prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Goldman Sachs website ↗IBDS filings on SEC EDGAR ↗IBDS prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for IBDS ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GBIL against IBDS, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gbil-vs-ibds

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.