Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FYX vs RSSL: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FYX returned +26.2% to RSSL's +14.1%; 32% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FYX and RSSL

Net assets: $1.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund, and $1.4bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Russell 2000 ETF.

At a glance
+26.2%
FYX total return, 1 year
+14.1%
RSSL total return, 1 year
0.58%
FYX expense ratio
0.08%
RSSL expense ratio

Pair scorecard

RSSL costs 0.50 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.1 points; RSSL is 1.1 times larger.

FYX vs RSSL: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFYXRSSL
Return
Total return, 1 year+26.2%+14.1%
Drawdown
Below its high5.0%, high on Aug 4, 20267.6%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNasdaq AlphaDEX Small Cap Core IndexRussell 2000 RIC Capped Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.58%0.08%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026$1.3bn$1.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common32%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund3.9%3.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jun 14, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026 · 123 weekly returns
FYX RSSL
Return
Total return edge FYX +59.6% +42.2%
Annualized edge FYX +21.9% +16.0%
Price return edge FYX +54.9% +37.5%
Risk
Volatility edge Tie 19.7% 19.7%
Max drawdown edge Tie −24.9% −24.7%
Downside capture 110.3% 102.8%
Beta 1.19 1.06
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge FYX 0.89 0.64
Sortino edge FYX 1.37 0.96
Treynor 0.086 0.119
Calmar edge FYX 0.88 0.65
Against the benchmark
Alpha −1.6% a year −0.5% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.62 −0.07
Information ratio 0.02 0.02
Tracking error 12.0% 12.1%

Each against its own benchmark: FYX against IWV, May 18, 2007 to Oct 23, 2026; RSSL against VOO, Jun 14, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

FYX returned more: +59.6% to +42.2%. FYX and RSSL swung about the same: 19.7% and 19.7%. FYX and RSSL fell about the same at their worst: −24.9% and −24.7%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FYX vs RSSL: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFYXRSSLEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+59.6%+42.2%FYXPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+21.9%+16.0%FYXTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+54.9%+37.5%FYXPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility19.7%19.7%TieSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation12.8%13.2%FYX (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−24.9%−24.7%TieDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture122.6%102.3%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture110.3%102.8%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.191.06Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.780.63Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.890.64FYXReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.370.96FYXReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0860.119Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.880.65FYXAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWVVOOThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−1.6% a year−0.5% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.62−0.07Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−6.7% to +3.5%−16.2% to +15.1%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.020.02Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error12.0%12.1%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 123 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

32%

By the books each fund has filed, FYX and RSSL hold 32% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

32% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FYX RSSL
Indivior Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 0.18% 0.15%
Resideo Technologies, Inc. 0.31% 0.15%
Kontoor Brands, Inc. 0.15% 0.15%
Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. 0.35% 0.15%
Itron, Inc. 0.20% 0.14%
Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. 0.32% 0.14%
BGC Group Inc. (Class A) 0.30% 0.14%
Korn Ferry 0.26% 0.14%
Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. 0.20% 0.14%
United Community Banks, Inc. 0.27% 0.14%
SkyWest, Inc. 0.30% 0.14%
International Bancshares Corporation 0.24% 0.14%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FYX
Mattel, Inc. 0.37%
Post Holdings, Inc. 0.33%
Assured Guaranty Ltd. 0.32%
Thor Industries, Inc. 0.31%
Seaboard Corporation 0.30%
Array Digital Infrastructure Inc 0.29%
Graphic Packaging Holding Company 0.29%
Netskope, Inc. (Class A) 0.28%
Only in RSSL
MOOG INC. 0.36%
HUT 8 CORP. 0.36%
UMB FINANCIAL CORPORATION 0.35%
CYTOKINETICS, INCORPORATED 0.33%
VIASAT, INC. 0.31%
BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES, INC. 0.31%
GLAUKOS CORPORATION 0.31%
CARETRUST REIT, INC. 0.31%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FYX First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund RSSL Global X Russell 2000 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +26.2% +14.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.3% (IWV) +13.7% (VOO)
Gap to its benchmark +12.9 pts vs IWV +0.4 pts vs VOO
Expense ratio 0.58% 0.08%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 525 1960
Net assets, FYX as of Oct 27, 2026 and RSSL as of Oct 12, 2026 $1.4bn $1.4bn

FYX and RSSL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-73AB672441

FYX and RSSL are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. FYX follows Nasdaq AlphaDEX Small Cap Core Index and RSSL follows Russell 2000 RIC Capped Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 32% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FYX returned +26.2% and RSSL +14.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 12.1 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

FYX flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FYX

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +26.2% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.

FYX tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.58% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 525 positions, with the top ten at 3.9%. It sat 5.0% below its high of Aug 4, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

RSSL

RSSL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,960 positions, with the top ten at 3.2%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FYX or RSSL?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FYX returned +26.2% and RSSL +14.1%.
Which is cheaper, FYX or RSSL?
RSSL is cheaper, by 0.50 percentage points a year. That is about $50 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FYX and RSSL overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of FYX and 0% of RSSL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FYX against RSSL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fyx-vs-rssl

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.