Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FTEC vs IWD: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FTEC returned +25.0% to IWD's +27.5%; 20% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FTEC and IWD

Net assets: $22.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF, and $83.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF.

At a glance
+25.0%
FTEC total return, 1 year
+27.5%
IWD total return, 1 year
0.08%
FTEC expense ratio
0.18%
IWD expense ratio

Pair scorecard

FTEC costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.5 points; IWD is 3.7 times larger.

FTEC vs IWD: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFTECIWD
Return
Total return, 1 year+25.0%+27.5%
Drawdown
Below its high4.9%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 IndexRussell 1000 Value Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.08%0.18%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$22.1bn$81.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common20%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund62.2%29.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026 · 677 weekly returns
FTEC IWD
Return
Total return edge FTEC +1,178.5% +277.8%
Annualized edge FTEC +21.6% +10.7%
Price return edge FTEC +1,031.1% +185.3%
Risk
Volatility edge IWD 21.3% 16.1%
Max drawdown edge FTEC (slight) −34.1% −35.6%
Downside capture 100.0% 100.2%
Beta 1.00 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge FTEC 0.94 0.59
Sortino edge FTEC 1.41 0.83
Treynor 0.199 0.110
Calmar edge FTEC 0.63 0.30
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.1% a year −0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.70 −0.23
Information ratio −0.19 −0.08
Tracking error 0.7% 1.1%

Each against its own benchmark: FTEC against VGT, Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026; IWD against VONV, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

FTEC returned more: +1,178.5% to +277.8%. IWD swung less: 16.1% to 21.3%. FTEC fell slightly less at its worst: −34.1% to −35.6%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FTEC vs IWD: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFTECIWDEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+1,178.5%+277.8%FTECPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+21.6%+10.7%FTECTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+1,031.1%+185.3%FTECPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility21.3%16.1%IWDSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation14.1%11.5%IWDLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−34.1%−35.6%FTEC (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture99.7%100.0%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture100.0%100.2%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.001.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.001.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.940.59FTECReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.410.83FTECReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1990.110Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.630.30FTECAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVGTVONVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.1% a year−0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.70−0.23Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.5% to +0.2%−0.6% to +0.5%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.19−0.08Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error0.7%1.1%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 677 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

20%

By the books each fund has filed, FTEC and IWD hold 20% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

20% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FTEC IWD
Apple Inc 16.21% 6.08%
Microsoft Corp 10.93% 5.21%
Cisco Systems Inc 1.92% 1.16%
Intel Corp 1.65% 1.13%
International Business Machines Corp 0.88% 0.62%
QUALCOMM Inc 0.68% 0.51%
Analog Devices Inc 0.78% 0.51%
Salesforce Inc 0.65% 0.51%
Accenture PLC 0.45% 0.38%
Dell Technologies Inc 0.59% 0.35%
Synopsys Inc 0.33% 0.23%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co 0.34% 0.21%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FTEC
NVIDIA Corp 17.09%
Broadcom Inc 4.20%
Micron Technology Inc 3.82%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.18%
Applied Materials Inc 1.69%
Lam Research Corp 1.54%
Palo Alto Networks Inc 1.17%
Palantir Technologies Inc 1.13%
Only in IWD
AMAZON.COM INC 5.95%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 2.67%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 2.37%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.96%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.71%
WALMART 1.26%
ABBVIE 1.23%
CHEVRON 1.12%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI Information Technology Tracks the Russell 1000 value
Total return, 1 year +25.0% +27.5%
Its benchmark over the same days +24.7% (VGT) +27.7% (VONV)
Gap to its benchmark +0.3 pts vs VGT −0.2 pts vs VONV
Expense ratio 0.08% 0.18%
Already in the S&P 500 87.8% 90.0%
Holdings 281 871
Net assets, FTEC as of Sep 30, 2026 and IWD as of Oct 27, 2026 $22.1bn $83.0bn

FTEC and IWD on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-F1AAB98938

FTEC and IWD do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. FTEC follows MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index and IWD follows Russell 1000 Value Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 20% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FTEC returned +25.0% and IWD +27.5% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 2.5 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IWD flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FTEC

FTEC tracks the MSCI Information Technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +25.0% with distributions reinvested, against +24.7% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 281 positions, with the top ten at 62.2%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

IWD

IWD tracks the Russell 1000 value. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +27.5% with distributions reinvested, against +27.7% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 871 positions, with the top ten at 29.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FTEC or IWD?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTEC returned +25.0% and IWD +27.5%.
Which is cheaper, FTEC or IWD?
FTEC is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FTEC and IWD overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 88% of FTEC and 90% of IWD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FTEC against IWD, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftec-vs-iwd

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.