Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FTCS vs RPV: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FTCS returned +9.5% to RPV's +22.3%; 6% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FTCS and RPV

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $7.8bn for First Trust Capital Strength ETF and $1.7bn for Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF.

At a glance
+9.5%
FTCS total return, 1 year
+22.3%
RPV total return, 1 year
0.53%
FTCS expense ratio
0.35%
RPV expense ratio

Pair scorecard

RPV costs 0.18 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.8 points; FTCS is 4.6 times larger.

FTCS vs RPV: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFTCSRPV
Return
Total return, 1 year+9.5%+22.3%
Benchmark
What it tracksCapital Strength IndexS&P 500 Pure Value Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.53%0.35%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$7.8bn$1.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common6%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund21.0%21.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jul 21, 2006 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,057 weekly returns
FTCS RPV
Return
Total return edge FTCS (slight) +596.7% +537.8%
Annualized edge FTCS (slight) +10.0% +9.5%
Price return edge FTCS +422.7% +305.1%
Risk
Volatility edge FTCS 18.1% 25.2%
Max drawdown edge FTCS −52.7% −75.3%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge FTCS 0.53 0.42
Sortino edge FTCS 0.75 0.60
Calmar edge FTCS 0.19 0.13
Reading

FTCS returned slightly more: +596.7% to +537.8%. FTCS swung less: 18.1% to 25.2%. FTCS fell less at its worst: −52.7% to −75.3%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FTCS vs RPV: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFTCSRPVEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+596.7%+537.8%FTCS (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+10.0%+9.5%FTCS (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+422.7%+305.1%FTCSPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility18.1%25.2%FTCSSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation12.8%17.6%FTCSLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−52.7%−75.3%FTCSDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.530.42FTCSReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.750.60FTCSReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.190.13FTCSAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,057 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

6%

By the books each fund has filed, FTCS and RPV hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

6% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FTCS RPV
Target Corporation 1.89% 1.81%
Phillips 66 1.81% 2.05%
Cencora, Inc. 1.88% 0.87%
Arch Capital Group Ltd. 1.97% 0.53%
Chubb Limited 1.98% 0.47%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FTCS
Lockheed Martin Corporation 2.25%
CSX Corporation 2.13%
Northrop Grumman Corporation 2.12%
Cincinnati Financial Corporation 2.11%
Johnson & Johnson 2.08%
PPG Industries, Inc. 2.08%
3M Company 2.06%
Union Pacific Corporation 2.06%
Only in RPV
Centene Corp 2.81%
Humana Inc 2.48%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co 2.17%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co 2.12%
Dow Inc 2.12%
Valero Energy Corp 2.05%
Bunge Global SA 2.00%
Marathon Petroleum Corp 1.98%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FTCS First Trust Capital Strength ETF RPV Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +9.5% +22.3%
Expense ratio 0.53% 0.35%
Already in the S&P 500 99.9% 99.1%
Holdings 50 120
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $7.8bn $1.7bn

FTCS and RPV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-4B5731B8DF

FTCS and RPV are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. FTCS follows Capital Strength Index and RPV follows S&P 500 Pure Value Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 6% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FTCS returned +9.5% and RPV +22.3% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 12.8 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

FTCS and RPV flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FTCS

FTCS tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +9.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.53% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 50 positions, with the top ten at 21.0%.

RPV

RPV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +22.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 120 positions, with the top ten at 21.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FTCS or RPV?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTCS returned +9.5% and RPV +22.3%.
Which is cheaper, FTCS or RPV?
RPV is cheaper, by 0.18 percentage points a year. That is about $18 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FTCS and RPV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of FTCS and 99% of RPV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FTCS against RPV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftcs-vs-rpv

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.