FTA vs VFMF: how they differ
FTA and VFMF hold 20% of their weight in the same names, and VFMF returned +29.9% over the year. First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund and Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF.
VFMF costs 0.40 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.1 points; FTA is 1.2 times larger.
| FTA | VFMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.58% | 0.18% |
| Net assets, FTA as of Oct 9, 2026 and VFMF as of Sep 30, 2026 | $1.4bn | $1.1bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +19.8% | +29.9% |
| Holdings in common | 20% | |
| Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year | +23.6% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 9.5% | 8.9% |
| Below its high | 6.0%, high on Aug 24, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FTA and VFMF hold 20% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
20% in common
On the same fields
FTA and VFMF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FTA in plain words
FTA tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.58% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 187 positions, with the top ten at 9.5%. It sat 6.0% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
VFMF in plain words
VFMF is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +29.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 47% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 613 positions, with the top ten at 8.9%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FTA or VFMF?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTA returned +19.8% and VFMF +29.9%.
- Which is cheaper, FTA or VFMF?
- VFMF is cheaper, by 0.40 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $40. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
ETFIQ, FTA against VFMF, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fta-vs-vfmf
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). FTA against VFMF. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fta-vs-vfmf
[FTA against VFMF (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fta-vs-vfmf)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.