FTA vs FVD: how they differ
FTA and FVD hold 23% of their weight in the same names, and FTA returned +19.8% over the year. First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund and First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund.
FTA costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 13.2 points; FVD is 5.6 times larger.
| FTA | FVD | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.58% | 0.62% |
| Net assets | $1.4bn | $7.6bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +19.8% | +6.6% |
| Holdings in common | 23% | |
| Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year | +23.6% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 9.5% | 4.5% |
| Below its high | 6.0%, high on Aug 24, 2026 | 6.1%, high on Aug 24, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FTA and FVD hold 23% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.
half
23% in common
On the same fields
FTA and FVD on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FTA in plain words
FTA tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.58% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 187 positions, with the top ten at 9.5%. It sat 6.0% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
FVD in plain words
FVD tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +6.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.62% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 63% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 239 positions, with the top ten at 4.5%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FTA or FVD?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTA returned +19.8% and FVD +6.6%.
- Which is cheaper, FTA or FVD?
- FTA is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $4. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
ETFIQ, FTA against FVD, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fta-vs-fvd
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). FTA against FVD. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fta-vs-fvd
[FTA against FVD (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fta-vs-fvd)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.