Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
FNDX vs XLV: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FNDX returned +23.9% to XLV's +25.6%; 13% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FNDX and XLV
Net assets: $27.6bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF, and $47.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF.
Pair scorecard
XLV costs 0.17 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.7 points.
| Measure | FNDX | XLV |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +23.9% | +25.6% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Fundamental U.S. Large Company | Health Care Select Sector Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.08% |
| Net assets, FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026 and XLV as of Oct 27, 2026 | $27.6bn | $47.0bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 13% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 21.0% | 60.6% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and XLV hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
13% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
FNDX and XLV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FNDX and XLV do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. FNDX follows Fundamental U.S. Large Company and XLV follows Health Care Select Sector Index.
- Holdings in common. 13% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
- Number of holdings. FNDX holds 731 positions and XLV holds 62.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.
FNDX tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 731 positions, with the top ten at 21.0%.
XLV
XLV tracks an index of Health care. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +25.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 62 positions, with the top ten at 60.6%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or XLV?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +23.9% and XLV +25.6%.
- Which is cheaper, FNDX or XLV?
- XLV is cheaper, by 0.17 percentage points a year. That is about $17 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FNDX against XLV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-xlv
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). FNDX against XLV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-xlv
[FNDX against XLV (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-xlv)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.