Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FNDX vs VGT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FNDX returned +23.9% to VGT's +24.7%; 18% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FNDX and VGT

Net assets: $27.6bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF, and $154.5bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Information Tech ETF.

At a glance
+23.9%
FNDX total return, 1 year
+24.7%
VGT total return, 1 year
0.25%
FNDX expense ratio
0.09%
VGT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VGT costs 0.16 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.8 points.

FNDX vs VGT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFNDXVGT
Return
Total return, 1 year+23.9%+24.7%
Drawdown
Below its high4.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksFundamental U.S. Large CompanyMSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.25%0.09%
Net assets, FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026 and VGT as of Sep 30, 2026$27.6bn$154.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common18%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund21.0%63.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Aug 23, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026 · 687 weekly returns
FNDX VGT
Return
Total return edge VGT +418.7% +1,271.6%
Annualized edge VGT +13.3% +21.9%
Price return edge VGT +298.9% +1,101.9%
Risk
Volatility edge FNDX 15.9% 21.1%
Max drawdown edge VGT (slight) −35.2% −34.1%
Downside capture 92.1% 99.9%
Beta 0.93 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge VGT 0.74 0.95
Sortino edge VGT 1.05 1.44
Treynor 0.128 0.201
Calmar edge VGT 0.38 0.64
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.4% a year +0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.28 0.80
Information ratio −0.10 0.19
Tracking error 5.3% 0.7%

Each against its own benchmark: FNDX against IWB, Aug 23, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026; VGT against FTEC, Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

VGT returned more: +1,271.6% to +418.7%. FNDX swung less: 15.9% to 21.1%. VGT fell slightly less at its worst: −34.1% to −35.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FNDX vs VGT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFNDXVGTEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+418.7%+1,271.6%VGTPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+13.3%+21.9%VGTTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+298.9%+1,101.9%VGTPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility15.9%21.1%FNDXSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation11.2%14.0%FNDXLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−35.2%−34.1%VGT (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture86.4%100.0%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture92.1%99.9%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.931.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.901.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.740.95VGTReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.051.44VGTReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1280.201Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.380.64VGTAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWBFTECThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.4% a year+0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.280.80Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−2.4% to +3.2%−0.2% to +0.5%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.100.19Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error5.3%0.7%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 687 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

18%

By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and VGT hold 18% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

18% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FNDX VGT
Apple Inc 4.46% 15.91%
Microsoft Corp 2.82% 11.16%
Intel Corp 1.42% 1.98%
Micron Technology Inc 0.97% 4.45%
Cisco Systems Inc 0.73% 1.60%
NVIDIA Corp 0.63% 17.58%
Broadcom Inc 0.48% 4.11%
Applied Materials Inc 0.39% 1.53%
QUALCOMM Inc 0.34% 0.76%
Texas Instruments Inc 0.34% 0.98%
Accenture PLC 0.32% 0.45%
International Business Machines Corp 0.31% 0.77%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FNDX
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 2.42%
Amazon.com Inc 1.80%
Alphabet Inc 1.78%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.63%
Chevron Corp 1.61%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.60%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 1.45%
Alphabet Inc 1.41%
Only in VGT
Palantir Technologies Inc 1.55%
Crowdstrike Holdings Inc 1.02%
Snowflake Inc 0.45%
Cloudflare Inc 0.45%
Datadog Inc 0.36%
Lumentum Holdings Inc 0.30%
NXP Semiconductors NV 0.26%
Astera Labs Inc 0.23%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF VGT Vanguard Information Tech ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company Tracks an index of Information technology
Total return, 1 year +23.9% +24.7%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.1% (IWB) +25.0% (FTEC)
Gap to its benchmark +10.8 pts vs IWB −0.3 pts vs FTEC
Expense ratio 0.25% 0.09%
Already in the S&P 500 88.4% 86.8%
Holdings 731 320
Net assets, FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026 and VGT as of Sep 30, 2026 $27.6bn $154.5bn

FNDX and VGT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-09232D63A6

FNDX and VGT do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. FNDX follows Fundamental U.S. Large Company and VGT follows MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50.
  2. Holdings in common. 18% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
  3. Cost. FNDX charges 0.25% of assets a year and VGT 0.09%, a gap of 0.16 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FNDX

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.

FNDX tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 731 positions, with the top ten at 21.0%.

VGT

VGT tracks an index of Information technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.7% with distributions reinvested, against +25.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 320 positions, with the top ten at 63.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or VGT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +23.9% and VGT +24.7%.
Which is cheaper, FNDX or VGT?
VGT is cheaper, by 0.16 percentage points a year. That is about $16 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNDX and VGT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 88% of FNDX and 87% of VGT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FNDX against VGT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-vgt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.