Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FNDX vs MBB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FNDX returned +23.9% to MBB's −0.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FNDX and MBB

Net assets: $27.6bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF, and $35.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MBS ETF.

At a glance
+23.9%
FNDX total return, 1 year
−0.8%
MBB total return, 1 year
0.25%
FNDX expense ratio
0.04%
MBB expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MBB costs 0.21 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 24.7 points.

FNDX vs MBB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFNDXMBB
Return
Total return, 1 year+23.9%−0.8%
Benchmark
What it tracksFundamental U.S. Large CompanyBloomberg U.S. MBS Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.25%0.04%
Net assets, FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026 and MBB as of Oct 28, 2026$27.6bn$35.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight88%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund21.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and MBB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FNDX MBB
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FNDX
Apple Inc 4.46%
Microsoft Corp 2.82%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 2.42%
Amazon.com Inc 1.80%
Alphabet Inc 1.78%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.63%
Chevron Corp 1.61%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.60%
Only in MBB
BLACKROCK CASH CL INST SL AGENCY 5.45%
FHLMC 30YR UMBS SUPER 1.05%
UMBS 30YR TBA(REG A) 0.60%
GNMA2 30YR 0.59%
GNMA2 30YR 0.54%
FNMA 30YR UMBS 0.53%
GNMA2 30YR 0.53%
GNMA2 30YR 0.52%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF MBB iShares MBS ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company Tracks an index of mortgage-backed securities
Total return, 1 year +23.9% −0.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.1% (IWB) −1.1% (SPMB)
Gap to its benchmark +10.8 pts vs IWB +0.3 pts vs SPMB
Expense ratio 0.25% 0.04%
Holdings 731 10813
Net assets, FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026 and MBB as of Oct 28, 2026 $27.6bn $35.5bn

FNDX and MBB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

MBB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FNDX

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.

FNDX tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 731 positions, with the top ten at 21.0%.

MBB

MBB tracks an index of mortgage-backed securities. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against −1.1% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. MBS Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or MBB?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +23.9% and MBB −0.8%.
Which is cheaper, FNDX or MBB?
MBB is cheaper, by 0.21 percentage points a year. That is about $21 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FNDX against MBB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-mbb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.