FMDE vs VFMO: Differences, Returns & Fees
FMDE and VFMO hold 18% of their weight in the same names, and FMDE returned +17.2% over the year. Net assets on Sep 30, 2026: $8.1bn for Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Core ETF and $1.9bn for Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF.
VFMO costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.0 points; FMDE is 4.3 times larger.
| FMDE | VFMO | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.23% | 0.13% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $8.1bn | $1.9bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.2% | +13.2% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 18% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 9.8% | 9.5% |
| Below its high | 3.1%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | 11.5%, high on Jun 30, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
FMDE and VFMO are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Holdings in common. 18% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 FMDE returned +17.2% and VFMO +13.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 4.0 points.
- Cost. FMDE charges 0.23% of assets a year and VFMO 0.13%, a gap of 0.10 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FMDE and VFMO hold 18% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
half
18% in common
On the same fields
FMDE and VFMO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About FMDE
FMDE is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.23% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 60% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 421 positions, with the top ten at 9.8%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
About VFMO
VFMO is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 43% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 704 positions, with the top ten at 9.5%. It sat 11.5% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +13.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FMDE or VFMO?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FMDE returned +17.2% and VFMO +13.2%.
- Which is cheaper, FMDE or VFMO?
- VFMO is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FMDE against VFMO, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fmde-vs-vfmo
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). FMDE against VFMO. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fmde-vs-vfmo
[FMDE against VFMO (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fmde-vs-vfmo)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.