FMDE vs IWR: Differences, Returns & Fees
FMDE and IWR hold 30% of their weight in the same names, and FMDE returned +17.2% over the year. Net assets: $8.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Core ETF, and $57.0bn on Oct 20, 2026 for iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF.
IWR costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.1 points; IWR is 6.8 times larger.
| FMDE | IWR | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.23% | 0.18% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $8.1bn | $54.9bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.2% | +15.1% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Russell Midcap Index |
| Holdings in common | 30% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 9.8% | 6.8% |
| Below its high | 3.1%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | 4.3%, high on Aug 14, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FMDE and IWR hold 30% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
half
30% in common
On the same fields
FMDE and IWR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About FMDE
FMDE is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.23% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 60% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 421 positions, with the top ten at 9.8%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
About IWR
IWR tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 62% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 825 positions, with the top ten at 6.8%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +15.1% with distributions reinvested, against +15.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FMDE or IWR?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FMDE returned +17.2% and IWR +15.1%.
- Which is cheaper, FMDE or IWR?
- IWR is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FMDE against IWR, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fmde-vs-iwr
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). FMDE against IWR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fmde-vs-iwr
[FMDE against IWR (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fmde-vs-iwr)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.