FLOT vs TBUX: Differences, Returns & Fees
FLOT's duration was 0.0 years on Jul 31, 2026 and TBUX's 0.7 on May 31, 2026; FLOT charges 0.15% to TBUX's 0.17%. Net assets: $11.5bn on Oct 20, 2026 for iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF, and $1.9bn on Oct 19, 2026 for T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF.
FLOT costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.4 points; FLOT is 5.9 times larger.
| FLOT | TBUX | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.17% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 19, 2026 | $11.5bn | $1.9bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +4.3% | +3.9% |
| What it tracks | not read by ETFIQ | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | report dates differ | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
FLOT and TBUX are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. FLOT follows not read by ETFIQ and TBUX follows No index, actively managed.
- Size. FLOT has $11.5bn in net assets and TBUX $1.9bn (net assets, as of Oct 19, 2026); FLOT is 6.1 times larger.
- One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 FLOT returned +4.3% and TBUX +3.9% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 0.4 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
On the same fields
FLOT and TBUX on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About FLOT
FLOT tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +4.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
About TBUX
TBUX is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.9% with distributions reinvested, against −1.9% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.17% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FLOT or TBUX?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FLOT returned +4.3% and TBUX +3.9%.
- Which is cheaper, FLOT or TBUX?
- FLOT is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. That is about $2 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FLOT against TBUX, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/flot-vs-tbux
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). FLOT against TBUX. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/flot-vs-tbux
[FLOT against TBUX (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/flot-vs-tbux)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.