Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
FLKR vs MUB: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FLKR returned +79.7% to MUB's −0.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FLKR and MUB
Net assets: $1.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF, and $54.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares National Muni Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
MUB costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 80.1 points; MUB is far larger, $54.1bn against $1.7bn.
| Measure | FLKR | MUB |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +79.7% | −0.4% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 24.1%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index | ICE AMT-Free US National Municipal Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.09% | 0.05% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026 | $1.7bn | $54.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 64.6% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, FLKR and MUB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
FLKR and MUB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FLKR
FLKR tracks the FTSE South Korea. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +79.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 156 positions, with the top ten at 64.6%. It sat 24.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
MUB
MUB tracks an index of National Muni Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FLKR or MUB?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FLKR returned +79.7% and MUB −0.4%.
- Which is cheaper, FLKR or MUB?
- MUB is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. That is about $4 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FLKR against MUB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/flkr-vs-mub
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). FLKR against MUB. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/flkr-vs-mub
[FLKR against MUB (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/flkr-vs-mub)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.