FLCB vs SPAB: Differences, Returns & Fees

On Jun 30, 2026 FLCB's duration was 5.8 years and SPAB's 5.9; SPAB charges 0.03% to FLCB's 0.15%. Net assets: $3.1bn on Oct 9, 2026 for Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF, and $9.9bn on Oct 8, 2026 for State Street SPDR Portfolio Aggregate Bond ETF.

SPAB costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.1 points; SPAB is 3.2 times larger.

FLCBSPAB
Expense ratio0.15%0.03%
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026$3.1bn$9.9bn
Total return, 1 year−1.7%−1.6%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedBloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ?
Holdings in common7%
Below its high5.0%, high on Aug 4, 20204.9%, high on Aug 4, 2020

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

−1.7%
FLCB total return, 1 year
−1.6%
SPAB total return, 1 year
0.15%
FLCB expense ratio
0.03%
SPAB expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FLCB and SPAB hold 7% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

half

7% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding FLCB SPAB
T 4.25 08/15/35, due Aug 15, 2035 0.56% 0.40%
T 4.625 02/15/46, due Feb 15, 2046 0.54% 0.32%
T 4.25 02/15/54, due Feb 15, 2054 0.36% 0.23%
T 4.75 08/15/55, due Aug 15, 2055 1.15% 0.23%
T 3.5 04/30/28, due Apr 30, 2028 1.17% 0.21%
T 4.125 08/15/53, due Aug 15, 2053 0.45% 0.19%
T 3.75 05/31/30, due May 31, 2030 0.58% 0.19%
T 4.125 07/31/28, due Jul 31, 2028 1.93% 0.19%
T 4.125 08/31/30, due Aug 31, 2030 0.78% 0.18%
T 4 10/31/29, due Oct 31, 2029 1.20% 0.18%
T 3.75 06/30/30, due Jun 30, 2030 0.32% 0.16%
T 3.625 05/15/53, due May 15, 2053 0.26% 0.15%
Only in FLCB
T 3.25 06/30/27, due Jun 30, 2027 3.16%
FNMA-30YR, due Aug 15, 2056 2.73%
FNMA-30YR, due Aug 15, 2056 2.13%
FNMA-30YR, due Aug 15, 2056 2.04%
FNMA-30YR, due Aug 15, 2056 1.64%
FNMA-30YR, due Aug 15, 2056 1.34%
FNMA-30YR, due Aug 15, 2056 1.32%
T 0.5 06/30/27, due Jun 30, 2027 1.08%
Only in SPAB
U.S. Treasury Notes, due Dec 15, 2028 0.79%
U.S. Treasury Notes, due Nov 30, 2028 0.44%
U.S. Treasury Notes, due Mar 31, 2031 0.43%
U.S. Treasury Notes, due Jan 31, 2028 0.42%
U.S. Treasury Notes, due Nov 15, 2034 0.40%
U.S. Treasury Notes, due Dec 31, 2027 0.39%
U.S. Treasury Notes, due Apr 30, 2028 0.38%
U.S. Treasury Notes, due May 15, 2034 0.37%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

FLCB
Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF
SPAB
State Street SPDR Portfolio Aggregate Bond ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year −1.7% −1.6%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 −18.9 pts −18.8 pts
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.03%
Holdings 588 8690
Net assets, FLCB as of Oct 9, 2026 and SPAB as of Oct 8, 2026 $3.1bn $9.9bn

FLCB and SPAB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

FLCB in plain words

FLCB is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned −1.7% with distributions reinvested, against −1.6% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 5.0% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 9, 2026.

SPAB in plain words

SPAB tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned −1.6% with distributions reinvested, against −1.6% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ?. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 4.9% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FLCB or SPAB?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FLCB returned −1.7% and SPAB −1.6%.
Which is cheaper, FLCB or SPAB?
SPAB is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. That is about $12 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FLCB against SPAB, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/flcb-vs-spab

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.