Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FENI vs MAGS: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FENI returned +14.2% to MAGS's +5.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FENI and MAGS

Net assets: $11.5bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Enhanced International ETF, and $5.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.

At a glance
+14.2%
FENI total return, 1 year
+5.8%
MAGS total return, 1 year
0.28%
FENI expense ratio
0.30%
MAGS expense ratio

Pair scorecard

FENI costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.4 points.

FENI vs MAGS: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFENIMAGS
Return
Total return, 1 year+14.2%+5.8%
Drawdown
Below its high4.7%, high on Aug 13, 20264.1%, high on Oct 13, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.28%0.30%
Net assets, FENI as of Sep 30, 2026 and MAGS as of Oct 28, 2026$11.5bn$5.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund16.5%29.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, FENI and MAGS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FENI MAGS
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FENI
ASML HOLDING NV 4.05%
NESTLE SA 1.74%
SIEMENS AG 1.61%
TOKYO ELECTRON LTD 1.44%
ROCHE HOLDING AG 1.39%
ABB LTD 1.32%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.31%
IBERDROLA SA 1.21%
Only in MAGS
Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 6.83%
NVIDIA Corp 3.52%
Apple Inc 3.49%
Amazon.com Inc 3.48%
Tesla Inc 3.45%
Microsoft Corp 3.07%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.04%
Alphabet Inc 2.45%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FENI Fidelity Enhanced International ETF MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +14.2% +5.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +12.1% (EFA) not measured
Gap to its benchmark +2.1 pts vs EFA not measured
Expense ratio 0.28% 0.30%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 22.5%
Holdings 386 8
Net assets, FENI as of Sep 30, 2026 and MAGS as of Oct 28, 2026 $11.5bn $5.5bn

FENI and MAGS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

MAGS flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FENI

FENI is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.2% with distributions reinvested, against +12.1% for its benchmark, the MSCI EAFE Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 386 positions, with the top ten at 16.5%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

MAGS

MAGS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Oct 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FENI or MAGS?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FENI returned +14.2% and MAGS +5.8%.
Which is cheaper, FENI or MAGS?
FENI is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. That is about $2 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FENI and MAGS overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of FENI and 22% of MAGS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FENI against MAGS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/feni-vs-mags

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.