FELG vs TGRW: Differences, Returns & Fees
FELG and TGRW hold 68% of their weight in the same names, and FELG returned +6.8% over the year. Net assets: $5.8bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF, and $1.2bn on Oct 20, 2026 for T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF.
FELG costs 0.34 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.2 points; FELG is 5.5 times larger.
| FELG | TGRW | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.52% |
| Net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026 | $5.7bn | $1.0bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +6.8% | +2.6% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 68% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 54.6% | 58.8% |
| Below its high | 5.2%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | 5.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
FELG and TGRW are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 FELG returned +6.8% and TGRW +2.6% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 4.2 points.
- Cost. FELG charges 0.18% of assets a year and TGRW 0.52%, a gap of 0.34 points.
- Size. FELG has $5.7bn in net assets and TGRW $1.0bn (net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026); FELG is 5.7 times larger.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FELG and TGRW hold 68% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
half
68% in common
On the same fields
FELG and TGRW on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About FELG
FELG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 142 positions, with the top ten at 54.6%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
About TGRW
TGRW is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.52% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 80 positions, with the top ten at 58.8%. It sat 5.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +4.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FELG or TGRW?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FELG returned +6.8% and TGRW +2.6%.
- Which is cheaper, FELG or TGRW?
- FELG is cheaper, by 0.34 percentage points a year. That is about $34 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FELG against TGRW, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/felg-vs-tgrw
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). FELG against TGRW. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/felg-vs-tgrw
[FELG against TGRW (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/felg-vs-tgrw)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.