Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
FDVV vs VPL: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FDVV returned +13.5% to VPL's +24.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FDVV and VPL
Net assets on Sep 30, 2026: $10.2bn for Fidelity High Dividend ETF and $9.0bn for Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF.
Pair scorecard
VPL costs 0.08 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.3 points; FDVV is 1.1 times larger.
| Measure | FDVV | VPL |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +13.5% | +24.8% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 7.2%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Fidelity High Dividend Index | FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.07% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $10.2bn | $9.0bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 33.8% | 24.8% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, FDVV and VPL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
FDVV and VPL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FDVV
FDVV tracks an index of High Dividend. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 95 positions, with the top ten at 33.8%.
VPL
VPL tracks an index of Pacific Stock. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,343 positions, with the top ten at 24.8%. It sat 7.2% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or VPL?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +13.5% and VPL +24.8%.
- Which is cheaper, FDVV or VPL?
- VPL is cheaper, by 0.08 percentage points a year. That is about $8 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FDVV against VPL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fdvv-vs-vpl
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). FDVV against VPL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fdvv-vs-vpl
[FDVV against VPL (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fdvv-vs-vpl)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.