Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FDVV vs MBB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FDVV returned +13.5% to MBB's −0.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FDVV and MBB

Net assets: $10.2bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity High Dividend ETF, and $35.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MBS ETF.

At a glance
+13.5%
FDVV total return, 1 year
−0.8%
MBB total return, 1 year
0.15%
FDVV expense ratio
0.04%
MBB expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MBB costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.3 points; MBB is 3.5 times larger.

FDVV vs MBB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFDVVMBB
Return
Total return, 1 year+13.5%−0.8%
Benchmark
What it tracksFidelity High Dividend IndexBloomberg U.S. MBS Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.04%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$10.2bn$36.2bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight87%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund33.8%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, FDVV and MBB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FDVV MBB
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FDVV
NVIDIA CORP 6.57%
APPLE INC 6.18%
MICROSOFT CORP 4.88%
BROADCOM INC 3.11%
JPMORGAN CHASE and CO 2.76%
DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC 2.66%
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION 1.96%
COCA COLA CO 1.96%
Only in MBB
BLACKROCK CASH CL INST SL AGENCY 5.45%
FHLMC 30YR UMBS SUPER 1.05%
UMBS 30YR TBA(REG A) 0.60%
GNMA2 30YR 0.59%
GNMA2 30YR 0.54%
FNMA 30YR UMBS 0.53%
GNMA2 30YR 0.53%
GNMA2 30YR 0.52%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF MBB iShares MBS ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks an index of High Dividend Tracks an index of mortgage-backed securities
Total return, 1 year +13.5% −0.8%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured −1.1% (SPMB)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +0.3 pts vs SPMB
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.04%
Holdings 95 10813
Net assets, FDVV as of Sep 30, 2026 and MBB as of Oct 28, 2026 $10.2bn $35.5bn

FDVV and MBB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

MBB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FDVV

FDVV tracks an index of High Dividend. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 95 positions, with the top ten at 33.8%.

MBB

MBB tracks an index of mortgage-backed securities. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against −1.1% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. MBS Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or MBB?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +13.5% and MBB −0.8%.
Which is cheaper, FDVV or MBB?
MBB is cheaper, by 0.11 percentage points a year. That is about $11 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FDVV against MBB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fdvv-vs-mbb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.