Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or LQD?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +17.2% and LQD returned −2.7%, so FDVV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, FDVV or LQD?

FDVV charges 0.15% a year and LQD charges 0.14%, so LQD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FDVV vs LQD: how they differ

FDVV and LQD hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FDVV returned more over the year.

Fidelity High Dividend ETF and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FDVV and LQD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FDVV	Only in LQD
NVIDIA CORP 6.86%	BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 0.88%
APPLE INC 5.70%	ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES LLC 0.12%
MICROSOFT CORP 4.50%	DEUTSCHE TELEKOM INTERNATIONAL FIN 0.11%
BROADCOM INC 3.50%	CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS OPERATING L 144A 0.10%
JPMORGAN CHASE and CO 2.58%	JPMORGAN CHASE & CO MTN 0.09%
ALPHABET INC 2.21%	BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLC 0.08%
COCA COLA CO 1.85%	MORGAN STANLEY (FXD-FRN) MTN 0.08%
PROCTER and GAMBLE CO 1.81%	CITIGROUP INC (FX-FRN) 0.07%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

FDVV and LQD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Fidelity	iShares
What it is	High Dividend	US investment grade bonds
Total return, 1 year	+17.2%	−2.7%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−0.3 pts	−20.2 pts
Expense ratio	0.15%	0.14%
Holdings	96	3149

FDVV in plain words

FDVV is an index equity fund tracking the High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 32.5%.

LQD in plain words

LQD is a bond fund tracking the US investment grade bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year. It sat 6.4% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or LQD?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +17.2% and LQD returned −2.7%, so FDVV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FDVV or LQD?: FDVV charges 0.15% a year and LQD charges 0.14%, so LQD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FDVV against LQD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FDVV against LQD, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fdvv-vs-lqd Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources