Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
FDVV vs KRE: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FDVV returned +13.5% to KRE's +21.2%; 1% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FDVV and KRE
Net assets: $10.2bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity High Dividend ETF, and $4.2bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF.
Pair scorecard
FDVV costs 0.20 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.7 points; FDVV is 2.8 times larger.
| Measure | FDVV | KRE |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +13.5% | +21.2% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 6.9%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Fidelity High Dividend Index | S&P Regional Banks Select Industry Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.35% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $10.2bn | $3.7bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 1% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 33.8% | 11.6% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, FDVV and KRE hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
1% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
FDVV and KRE on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FDVV
FDVV tracks an index of High Dividend. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 95 positions, with the top ten at 33.8%.
KRE
KRE tracks the S&P Regional Banking. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +21.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 7% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 167 positions, with the top ten at 11.6%. It sat 6.9% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or KRE?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +13.5% and KRE +21.2%.
- Which is cheaper, FDVV or KRE?
- FDVV is cheaper, by 0.20 percentage points a year. That is about $20 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FDVV against KRE, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fdvv-vs-kre
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). FDVV against KRE. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fdvv-vs-kre
[FDVV against KRE (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fdvv-vs-kre)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.