Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or XOP?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +17.3% and XOP returned +52.4%, so XOP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, FBCG or XOP?

FBCG charges 0.57% a year and XOP charges 0.35%, so XOP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FBCG vs XOP: how they differ

FBCG and XOP hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and XOP returned more over the year.

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and XOP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FBCG	Only in XOP
NVIDIA CORP 14.62%	PBF ENERGY INC CLASS A 3.89%
APPLE INC 9.64%	HF SINCLAIR CORP 3.27%
ALPHABET INC 9.10%	DELEK US HOLDINGS INC 3.27%
AMAZON.COM INC 8.43%	VALERO ENERGY CORP 3.21%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.20%	MARATHON PETROLEUM CORP 3.20%
META PLATFORMS INC 3.90%	PAR PACIFIC HOLDINGS INC 3.12%
BROADCOM INC 3.74%	PHILLIPS 66 3.06%
ELI LILLY and CO 2.25%	CALUMET INC 2.77%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

FBCG and XOP on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	XOP State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Fidelity	State Street
What it is	Blue Chip Growth	SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Total return, 1 year	+17.3%	+52.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−0.2 pts	+34.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.57%	0.35%
Holdings	214	54

FBCG in plain words

FBCG is an index equity fund tracking the Blue Chip Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 214 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XOP in plain words

XOP is a commodity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +52.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. It sat 26.8% below its high of Jun 23, 2014 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or XOP?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +17.3% and XOP returned +52.4%, so XOP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FBCG or XOP?: FBCG charges 0.57% a year and XOP charges 0.35%, so XOP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FBCG against XOP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBCG against XOP, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbcg-vs-xop Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources