Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FBCG vs SPYM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FBCG returned +9.5% to SPYM's +13.7%; 48% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FBCG and SPYM

Net assets: $7.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF, and $185.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF.

At a glance
+9.5%
FBCG total return, 1 year
+13.7%
SPYM total return, 1 year
0.57%
FBCG expense ratio
0.02%
SPYM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SPYM costs 0.55 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.2 points; SPYM is far larger, $173.6bn against $7.6bn.

FBCG vs SPYM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFBCGSPYM
Return
Total return, 1 year+9.5%+13.7%
Drawdown
Below its high5.7%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedS&P 500 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.57%0.02%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$7.6bn$173.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common48%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund57.2%38.1%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jun 12, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026 · 332 weekly returns
FBCG SPYM
Return
Total return edge FBCG +197.7% +174.3%
Annualized edge FBCG (slight) +18.6% +17.1%
Price return edge FBCG +197.2% +150.1%
Risk
Volatility edge SPYM 23.9% 15.8%
Max drawdown edge SPYM −42.6% −23.9%
Downside capture 126.3% 96.9%
Beta 1.39 0.96
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge SPYM 0.71 0.88
Sortino edge SPYM 1.09 1.36
Treynor 0.121 0.106
Calmar edge SPYM 0.44 0.72
Against the benchmark
Alpha −2.6% a year +0.4% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.70 0.53
Information ratio 0.26 0.00
Tracking error 11.2% 3.8%

Each against its own benchmark: FBCG against VOO, Jun 12, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026; SPYM against IVV, Nov 25, 2005 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

FBCG returned more: +197.7% to +174.3%. SPYM swung less: 15.8% to 23.9%. SPYM fell less at its worst: −23.9% to −42.6%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FBCG vs SPYM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFBCGSPYMEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+197.7%+174.3%FBCGPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+18.6%+17.1%FBCG (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+197.2%+150.1%FBCGPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility23.9%15.8%SPYMSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation15.5%10.3%SPYMLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−42.6%−23.9%SPYMDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture168.9%94.1%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture126.3%96.9%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.390.96Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.850.95Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.710.88SPYMReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.091.36SPYMReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1210.106Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.440.72SPYMAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVOOIVVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−2.6% a year+0.4% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.700.53Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−9.9% to +4.7%−1.2% to +2.0%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.260.00Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error11.2%3.8%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 332 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

48%

By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and SPYM hold 48% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

48% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FBCG SPYM
NVIDIA CORP 14.90% 7.92%
APPLE INC 9.31% 7.61%
MICROSOFT CORP 4.94% 5.92%
AMAZON.COM INC 5.86% 3.73%
ALPHABET INC 9.27% 2.83%
BROADCOM INC 4.38% 2.44%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.31% 2.05%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 1.97% 1.57%
TESLA INC 1.28% 1.72%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 1.06% 1.37%
MASTERCARD INC 0.85% 0.74%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 0.68% 0.55%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FBCG
ELI LILLY and CO 2.71%
SANDISK CORP 1.28%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MFG CO LTD 1.17%
SHARKNINJA INC 0.80%
CELESTICA INC 0.66%
ASTERA LABS INC 0.64%
SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP 0.45%
GE AEROSPACE 0.45%
Only in SPYM
ELI LILLY + CO 1.54%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CL B 1.52%
JPMORGAN CHASE + CO 1.34%
JOHNSON + JOHNSON 0.97%
WALMART INC 0.80%
CHEVRON CORP 0.68%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 0.66%
PROCTER + GAMBLE CO 0.56%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks the S&P 500
Total return, 1 year +9.5% +13.7%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark −4.2 pts vs VOO 0.0 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.57% 0.02%
Already in the S&P 500 85.3% 99.8%
Holdings 230 506
Net assets, FBCG as of Sep 30, 2026 and SPYM as of Oct 27, 2026 $7.6bn $185.0bn
Former ticker none SPLG

FBCG and SPYM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-379EC2A720

FBCG and SPYM do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. FBCG follows No index, actively managed and SPYM follows S&P 500 Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 48% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FBCG returned +9.5% and SPYM +13.7% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 4.2 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

SPYM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FBCG

FBCG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +9.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 230 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SPYM

SPYM tracks the S&P 500. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.7% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.02% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 506 positions, with the top ten at 38.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or SPYM?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +9.5% and SPYM +13.7%.
Which is cheaper, FBCG or SPYM?
SPYM is cheaper, by 0.55 percentage points a year. That is about $55 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FBCG and SPYM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 85% of FBCG and 100% of SPYM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FBCG against SPYM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbcg-vs-spym

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.