Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FBCG vs SPMO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FBCG returned +9.5% to SPMO's +18.4%; 28% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FBCG and SPMO

Net assets: $7.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF, and $22.3bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF.

At a glance
+9.5%
FBCG total return, 1 year
+18.4%
SPMO total return, 1 year
0.57%
FBCG expense ratio
0.13%
SPMO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SPMO costs 0.44 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.9 points.

FBCG vs SPMO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFBCGSPMO
Return
Total return, 1 year+9.5%+18.4%
Drawdown
Below its high5.7%, high on Oct 6, 202610.2%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedS&P 500 Momentum Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.57%0.13%
Net assets, FBCG as of Sep 30, 2026 and SPMO as of Oct 27, 2026$7.6bn$22.3bn
Holdings
Holdings in common28%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund57.2%50.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jun 12, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026 · 332 weekly returns · each against VOO
FBCG SPMO
Return
Total return edge SPMO +197.7% +249.3%
Annualized edge SPMO +18.6% +21.6%
Price return edge SPMO +197.2% +225.3%
Risk
Volatility edge SPMO 23.9% 19.5%
Max drawdown edge SPMO −42.6% −22.5%
Downside capture 126.3% 98.7%
Beta 1.39 1.05
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge SPMO 0.71 0.94
Sortino edge SPMO 1.09 1.49
Treynor 0.121 0.176
Calmar edge SPMO 0.44 0.96
Against the benchmark
Alpha −2.6% a year +3.8% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.70 0.92
Information ratio 0.26 0.43
Tracking error 11.2% 10.4%
Reading

SPMO returned more: +249.3% to +197.7%. SPMO swung less: 19.5% to 23.9%. SPMO fell less at its worst: −22.5% to −42.6%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FBCG vs SPMO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFBCGSPMOVOOEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+197.7%+249.3%SPMOPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+18.6%+21.6%SPMOTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+197.2%+225.3%SPMOPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility23.9%19.5%SPMOSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation15.5%12.4%SPMOLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−42.6%−22.5%SPMODeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture168.9%109.3%100.0%FBCGShare of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture126.3%98.7%100.0%SPMOShare of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.391.051.00SPMO lowerHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.850.721.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.710.94SPMOReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.091.49SPMOReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1210.1760.140SPMOReturn above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.440.96SPMOAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVOOVOOVOOThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−2.6% a year+3.8% a year0.0%Not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.700.92Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−9.9% to +4.7%−4.3% to +11.9%Both include zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.260.43SPMOReturn against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error11.2%10.4%0.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 332 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

28%

By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and SPMO hold 28% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

28% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FBCG SPMO
APPLE INC 9.31% 9.95%
ALPHABET INC 9.27% 4.76%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 1.97% 8.80%
WESTERN DIGITAL CORP 1.59% 1.58%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 1.06% 5.48%
MARVELL TECHNOLOGY INC 0.97% 1.02%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 0.68% 1.83%
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC 0.64% 1.75%
WELLTOWER INC 0.62% 0.86%
PALO ALTO NETWORKS INC 0.54% 1.86%
LAM RESEARCH CORP 0.49% 2.33%
LUMENTUM HOLDINGS INC 0.47% 0.89%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FBCG
NVIDIA CORP 14.90%
AMAZON.COM INC 5.86%
MICROSOFT CORP 4.94%
BROADCOM INC 4.38%
ELI LILLY and CO 2.71%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.31%
SANDISK CORP 1.28%
TESLA INC 1.28%
Only in SPMO
Johnson & Johnson 4.86%
Cisco Systems Inc 2.53%
Merck & Co Inc 2.22%
Sandisk Corp 2.20%
RTX Corp 1.15%
Analog Devices Inc 1.04%
Valero Energy Corp 0.94%
Marathon Petroleum Corp 0.81%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks the S&P 500 Momentum
Total return, 1 year +9.5% +18.4%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) +13.7% (VOO)
Gap to its benchmark −4.2 pts vs VOO +4.7 pts vs VOO
Expense ratio 0.57% 0.13%
Already in the S&P 500 85.3% 100.0%
Holdings 230 101
Net assets, FBCG as of Sep 30, 2026 and SPMO as of Oct 27, 2026 $7.6bn $22.3bn

FBCG and SPMO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-C006383C4B

FBCG and SPMO do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. FBCG follows No index, actively managed and SPMO follows S&P 500 Momentum Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 28% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FBCG returned +9.5% and SPMO +18.4% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 8.9 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

SPMO flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FBCG

FBCG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +9.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 230 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SPMO

SPMO tracks the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 50.7%. It sat 10.2% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or SPMO?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +9.5% and SPMO +18.4%.
Which is cheaper, FBCG or SPMO?
SPMO is cheaper, by 0.44 percentage points a year. That is about $44 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FBCG and SPMO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 85% of FBCG and 100% of SPMO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FBCG against SPMO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbcg-vs-spmo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.