Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

CGGR vs FBCG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGGR returned +2.6% to FBCG's +9.5%; 38% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CGGR and FBCG

Net assets: $25.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Growth ETF, and $7.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF.

At a glance
+2.6%
CGGR total return, 1 year
+9.5%
FBCG total return, 1 year
0.39%
CGGR expense ratio
0.57%
FBCG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

CGGR costs 0.18 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.9 points; CGGR is 3.4 times larger.

CGGR vs FBCG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGGRFBCG
Return
Total return, 1 year+2.6%+9.5%
Drawdown
Below its high3.4%, high on Oct 6, 20265.7%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.39%0.57%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$26.1bn$7.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common38%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund39.7%57.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Mar 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026 · 242 weekly returns · each against VOO
CGGR FBCG
Return
Total return edge FBCG +91.6% +113.5%
Annualized edge FBCG +15.0% +17.7%
Price return edge FBCG +89.2% +113.1%
Risk
Volatility edge CGGR 20.4% 23.9%
Max drawdown edge CGGR −27.7% −31.0%
Downside capture 115.9% 125.1%
Beta 1.20 1.38
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge FBCG (slight) 0.58 0.62
Sortino edge FBCG (slight) 0.88 0.96
Treynor 0.098 0.108
Calmar edge FBCG (slight) 0.54 0.57
Against the benchmark
Alpha −1.0% a year +0.2% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.37 0.05
Information ratio 0.18 0.42
Tracking error 6.7% 10.3%
Reading

FBCG returned more: +113.5% to +91.6%. CGGR swung less: 20.4% to 23.9%. CGGR fell less at its worst: −27.7% to −31.0%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: CGGR vs FBCG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGGRFBCGVOOEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+91.6%+113.5%FBCGPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+15.0%+17.7%FBCGTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+89.2%+113.1%FBCGPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility20.4%23.9%CGGRSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.5%15.6%CGGRLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−27.7%−31.0%CGGRDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture137.1%177.3%100.0%FBCGShare of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture115.9%125.1%100.0%CGGR (slight)Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.201.381.00CGGR lowerHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.920.881.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.580.62FBCG (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.880.96FBCG (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0980.1080.107FBCG (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.540.57FBCG (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVOOVOOVOOThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−1.0% a year+0.2% a year0.0%Not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.370.05Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−6.3% to +4.3%−7.4% to +7.7%Both include zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.180.42FBCGReturn against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error6.7%10.3%0.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 242 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

38%

By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and FBCG hold 38% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

38% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first CGGR FBCG
NVIDIA Corp 5.14% 14.90%
Microsoft Corp 4.63% 4.94%
Broadcom Inc 4.69% 4.38%
Alphabet Inc 3.21% 9.27%
Amazon.com Inc 2.48% 5.86%
Meta Platforms Inc 5.38% 2.31%
Apple Inc 2.29% 9.31%
Micron Technology Inc 3.57% 1.97%
Tesla Inc 4.19% 1.28%
GE Vernova Inc 0.75% 0.77%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 0.73% 0.68%
Welltower Inc 1.67% 0.62%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in CGGR
Capital Group Central Cash Fund 2.54%
Eli Lilly & Co 2.11%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc 2.03%
TransDigm Group Inc 1.85%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 1.39%
Strategy Inc 1.15%
Intuitive Surgical Inc 1.15%
General Electric Co 1.05%
Only in FBCG
ELI LILLY and CO 2.71%
SANDISK CORP 1.28%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MFG CO LTD 1.17%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 1.06%
MARVELL TECHNOLOGY INC 0.97%
MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS INC 0.94%
SHARKNINJA INC 0.80%
CELESTICA INC 0.66%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +2.6% +9.5%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) +13.7% (VOO)
Gap to its benchmark −11.1 pts vs VOO −4.2 pts vs VOO
Expense ratio 0.39% 0.57%
Already in the S&P 500 78.3% 85.3%
Holdings 96 230
Net assets, CGGR as of Oct 27, 2026 and FBCG as of Sep 30, 2026 $25.9bn $7.6bn

CGGR and FBCG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-E23CA69762

CGGR and FBCG do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. Holdings in common. 38% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026).
  2. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGGR returned +2.6% and FBCG +9.5% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 6.9 points.
  3. Cost. CGGR charges 0.39% of assets a year and FBCG 0.57%, a gap of 0.18 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CGGR

CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

FBCG

FBCG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +9.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 230 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or FBCG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +2.6% and FBCG +9.5%.
Which is cheaper, CGGR or FBCG?
CGGR is cheaper, by 0.18 percentage points a year. That is about $18 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGGR and FBCG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 78% of CGGR and 85% of FBCG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGGR against FBCG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-fbcg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.