Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FBCG vs LYTE: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

FBCG and LYTE are measured over different days, and FBCG charges 0.57% to LYTE's 0.65%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FBCG and LYTE

Net assets: $7.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF, and $165m on Oct 28, 2026 for Roundhill Photonics & Optics ETF.

At a glance
+9.5%
FBCG total return, 1 year
−19.6%
LYTE total return, since launch, Aug 6, 2026
0.57%
FBCG expense ratio
0.65%
LYTE expense ratio

Pair scorecard

FBCG costs 0.08 points a year less.

FBCG vs LYTE: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFBCGLYTE
Return
Total return, 1 year+9.5%not published
Drawdown
Below its high5.7%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Below its all-time high28.5%, high on Aug 17, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedPhotonics and optics
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.57%0.65%
Net assets, FBCG as of Sep 30, 2026 and LYTE as of Oct 28, 2026$7.6bn$165m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
In the S&P 500, by weight85%
Holdings datedJul 31, 2026
Top ten holdings, share of the fund57.2%

Method

Side by side

FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF LYTE Roundhill Photonics & Optics ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Thematic ETF
What it is Actively managed Photonics and optics
Total return, 1 year +9.5% −19.6% (since launch, Aug 6, 2026)
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −4.2 pts vs VOO not measured
Expense ratio 0.57% 0.65%
Holdings 230 not yet filed
Net assets, FBCG as of Sep 30, 2026 and LYTE as of Oct 28, 2026 $7.6bn $165m

FBCG and LYTE on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

LYTE flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FBCG

FBCG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +9.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 230 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

LYTE

LYTE has no public holdings filing captured yet. Since it first traded on Aug 6, 2026 the fund returned −19.6% with distributions reinvested. It sits 28.5% below its all-time high of Aug 17, 2026.

Questions people ask

Are FBCG and LYTE in the same category?
FBCG is a stock ETF and LYTE is a thematic ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which is cheaper, FBCG or LYTE?
FBCG is cheaper, by 0.08 percentage points a year. That is about $8 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FBCG against LYTE, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbcg-vs-lyte

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.