Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
FBCG vs GDX: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FBCG returned +9.5% to GDX's +19.0%, and GDX charges 0.51% to FBCG's 0.57%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FBCG and GDX
Net assets: $7.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF, and $25.6bn on Oct 27, 2026 for VanEck Gold Miners ETF.
Pair scorecard
GDX costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.5 points.
| Measure | FBCG | GDX |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +9.5% | +19.0% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 5.7%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Below its all-time high | 27.5%, high on Feb 27, 2026 | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Gold miners |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | ahead by 5.6 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.57% | 0.51% |
| Net assets, FBCG as of Sep 30, 2026 and GDX as of Oct 27, 2026 | $7.6bn | $25.6bn |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100% | |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 57.2% | 60% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and GDX hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
FBCG and GDX on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FBCG
FBCG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +9.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 230 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
GDX
By weight, 12% of GDX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 60% of the fund across 59 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +19.0% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was ahead by 5.6 pts. It sits 27.5% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Are FBCG and GDX in the same category?
- FBCG is a stock ETF and GDX is a thematic ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or GDX?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +9.5% and GDX +19.0%.
- Which is cheaper, FBCG or GDX?
- GDX is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. That is about $6 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FBCG against GDX, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbcg-vs-gdx
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). FBCG against GDX. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbcg-vs-gdx
[FBCG against GDX (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbcg-vs-gdx)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.