Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FBCG vs IJH: how they differ
FBCG and IJH hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FBCG returned more over the year.
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and IJH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in FBCG | Only in IJH |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP 14.62% | TWILIO CLASS A 1.00% |
| APPLE INC 9.64% | ILLUMINA INC 0.87% |
| ALPHABET INC 9.10% | TECHNIPFMC PLC 0.86% |
| AMAZON.COM INC 8.43% | EVERPURE INC CLASS A 0.85% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 5.20% | OKTA CLASS A 0.82% |
| META PLATFORMS INC 3.90% | ATI 0.78% |
| BROADCOM INC 3.74% | NVENT ELECTRIC PLC 0.72% |
| ELI LILLY and CO 2.25% | TENET HEALTHCARE CORP 0.65% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
| FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | iShares |
| What it is | Blue Chip Growth | S&P MidCap 400 |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.3% | +13.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.2 pts | −4.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.57% | 0.05% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 86.8% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 214 | 405 |
FBCG in plain words
FBCG is an index equity fund tracking the Blue Chip Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 214 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
IJH in plain words
IJH is an index equity fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 405 positions, with the top ten at 7.8%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or IJH?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +17.3% and IJH returned +13.4%, so FBCG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FBCG or IJH?
- FBCG charges 0.57% a year and IJH charges 0.05%, so IJH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FBCG and IJH overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FBCG and 0% of IJH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBCG against IJH, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbcg-vs-ijh Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources