Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IJH vs MAGS: how they differ
IJH and MAGS hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and MAGS returned more over the year.
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IJH and MAGS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in IJH | Only in MAGS |
|---|---|
| TWILIO CLASS A 1.00% | TREASURY BILL 65.41% |
| ILLUMINA INC 0.87% | Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 8.06% |
| TECHNIPFMC PLC 0.86% | NVIDIA Corp 4.15% |
| EVERPURE INC CLASS A 0.85% | Apple Inc 4.12% |
| OKTA CLASS A 0.82% | Amazon.com Inc 4.11% |
| ATI 0.78% | Tesla Inc 4.07% |
| NVENT ELECTRIC PLC 0.72% | Microsoft Corp 3.62% |
| TENET HEALTHCARE CORP 0.65% | Meta Platforms Inc 3.59% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
| IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Roundhill |
| What it is | S&P MidCap 400 | Magnificent Seven |
| Total return, 1 year | +13.4% | +14.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −4.1 pts | −3.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.05% | 0.30% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 26.5% |
| Holdings | 405 | 9 |
IJH in plain words
IJH is an index equity fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 405 positions, with the top ten at 7.8%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
MAGS in plain words
MAGS is an index equity fund tracking the Magnificent Seven. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 26% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 9 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IJH or MAGS?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJH returned +13.4% and MAGS returned +14.4%, so MAGS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IJH or MAGS?
- IJH charges 0.05% a year and MAGS charges 0.30%, so IJH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IJH and MAGS overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJH and 26% of MAGS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJH against MAGS, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ijh-vs-mags Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources