Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FBCG vs IEFA: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FBCG returned +9.5% to IEFA's +12.3%; 1% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FBCG and IEFA

Net assets: $7.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF, and $190.4bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF.

At a glance
+9.5%
FBCG total return, 1 year
+12.3%
IEFA total return, 1 year
0.57%
FBCG expense ratio
0.07%
IEFA expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IEFA costs 0.50 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.8 points; IEFA is far larger, $190.2bn against $7.6bn.

FBCG vs IEFA: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFBCGIEFA
Return
Total return, 1 year+9.5%+12.3%
Drawdown
Below its high5.7%, high on Oct 6, 20264.7%, high on Aug 25, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedMSCI EAFE IMI Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.57%0.07%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$7.6bn$190.2bn
Holdings
Holdings in common1%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund57.2%12.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jun 12, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026 · 332 weekly returns
FBCG IEFA
Return
Total return edge FBCG +197.7% +103.2%
Annualized edge FBCG +18.6% +11.7%
Price return edge FBCG +197.2% +66.4%
Risk
Volatility edge IEFA 23.9% 16.1%
Max drawdown edge IEFA −42.6% −29.9%
Downside capture 126.3% 97.7%
Beta 1.39 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge FBCG 0.71 0.58
Sortino edge FBCG 1.09 0.85
Treynor 0.121 0.073
Calmar edge FBCG 0.44 0.39
Against the benchmark
Alpha −2.6% a year +0.8% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.70 0.96
Information ratio 0.26 0.25
Tracking error 11.2% 3.2%

Each against its own benchmark: FBCG against VOO, Jun 12, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026; IEFA against ACWX, Nov 2, 2012 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

FBCG returned more: +197.7% to +103.2%. IEFA swung less: 16.1% to 23.9%. IEFA fell less at its worst: −29.9% to −42.6%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FBCG vs IEFA: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFBCGIEFAEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+197.7%+103.2%FBCGPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+18.6%+11.7%FBCGTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+197.2%+66.4%FBCGPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility23.9%16.1%IEFASpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation15.5%11.0%IEFALike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−42.6%−29.9%IEFADeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture168.9%98.1%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture126.3%97.7%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.391.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.850.96Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.710.58FBCGReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.090.85FBCGReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1210.073Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.440.39FBCGAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVOOACWXThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−2.6% a year+0.8% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.700.96Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−9.9% to +4.7%−0.9% to +2.5%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.260.25Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error11.2%3.2%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 332 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

1%

By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and IEFA hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

1% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FBCG IEFA
ASML HOLDING NV 0.30% 2.55%
BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO PLC 0.12% 0.48%
COMPASS INC 0.09% 0.23%
ARGENX SE 0.08% 0.22%
BARCLAYS PLC 0.07% 0.30%
STMICROELECTRONICS NV 0.05% 0.12%
NOKIA CORP 0.00% 0.18%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FBCG
NVIDIA CORP 14.90%
APPLE INC 9.31%
ALPHABET INC 9.27%
AMAZON.COM INC 5.86%
MICROSOFT CORP 4.94%
BROADCOM INC 4.38%
ELI LILLY and CO 2.71%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.31%
Only in IEFA
ROCHE PS PAR AG 1.36%
SHELL 1.21%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.18%
NOVARTIS AG 1.14%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 1.04%
NESTLE SA 1.04%
SAP 0.97%
MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP 0.92%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks the MSCI EAFE
Total return, 1 year +9.5% +12.3%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) +14.3% (ACWX)
Gap to its benchmark −4.2 pts vs VOO −2.0 pts vs ACWX
Expense ratio 0.57% 0.07%
Already in the S&P 500 85.3% 0.0%
Holdings 230 2629
Net assets, FBCG as of Sep 30, 2026 and IEFA as of Oct 28, 2026 $7.6bn $190.4bn

FBCG and IEFA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-13EA57D535

FBCG and IEFA do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. FBCG follows No index, actively managed and IEFA follows MSCI EAFE IMI Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 1% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FBCG returned +9.5% and IEFA +12.3% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 2.8 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IEFA flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FBCG

FBCG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +9.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 230 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

IEFA

IEFA tracks the MSCI EAFE. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.3% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,629 positions, with the top ten at 12.3%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or IEFA?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +9.5% and IEFA +12.3%.
Which is cheaper, FBCG or IEFA?
IEFA is cheaper, by 0.50 percentage points a year. That is about $50 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FBCG and IEFA overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 85% of FBCG and 0% of IEFA by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FBCG against IEFA, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbcg-vs-iefa

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.