Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EZU vs QUAL: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EZU returned +7.1% to QUAL's +13.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EZU and QUAL

Net assets: $9.2bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF, and $48.2bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF.

At a glance
+7.1%
EZU total return, 1 year
+13.1%
QUAL total return, 1 year
0.50%
EZU expense ratio
0.15%
QUAL expense ratio

Pair scorecard

QUAL costs 0.35 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.0 points; QUAL is 5.3 times larger.

EZU vs QUAL: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEZUQUAL
Return
Total return, 1 year+7.1%+13.1%
Drawdown
Below its high8.7%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI EMU IndexMSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.50%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 23, 2026$9.1bn$48.2bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund30.5%44.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EZU and QUAL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EZU QUAL
MERCK 0.29% 1.34%
AEROPORTS DE PARIS SA 0.06% 1.28%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EZU
ASML HOLDING 8.79%
SAP 3.33%
SIEMENS N AG 2.97%
ALLIANZ 2.55%
BANCO SANTANDER 2.48%
TOTALENERGIES 2.48%
IBERDROLA 2.10%
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC 2.05%
Only in QUAL
MICROSOFT 8.09%
APPLE 7.38%
NVIDIA 6.28%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 4.06%
ELI LILLY 4.04%
TJX 3.50%
VISA CLASS A 3.44%
LAM RESEARCH 2.84%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EZU iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI Eurozone Tracks the MSCI USA Quality Factor
Total return, 1 year +7.1% +13.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.3% (ACWX) +13.6% (MLRG)
Gap to its benchmark −7.2 pts vs ACWX −0.5 pts vs MLRG
Expense ratio 0.50% 0.15%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 97.2%
Holdings 216 119
Net assets, EZU as of Oct 27, 2026 and QUAL as of Oct 28, 2026 $9.2bn $48.2bn

EZU and QUAL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

EZU and QUAL flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EZU

EZU tracks the MSCI Eurozone. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 216 positions, with the top ten at 30.5%. It sat 8.7% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

QUAL

QUAL tracks the MSCI USA Quality Factor. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 119 positions, with the top ten at 44.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EZU or QUAL?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EZU returned +7.1% and QUAL +13.1%.
Which is cheaper, EZU or QUAL?
QUAL is cheaper, by 0.35 percentage points a year. That is about $35 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EZU and QUAL overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EZU and 97% of QUAL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EZU against QUAL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ezu-vs-qual

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.