Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EZU vs LQD: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EZU returned +7.1% to LQD's −3.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EZU and LQD

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $9.2bn for iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF and $30.6bn for iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF.

At a glance
+7.1%
EZU total return, 1 year
−3.4%
LQD total return, 1 year
0.50%
EZU expense ratio
0.14%
LQD expense ratio

Pair scorecard

LQD costs 0.36 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.5 points; LQD is 3.3 times larger.

EZU vs LQD: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEZULQD
Return
Total return, 1 year+7.1%−3.4%
Drawdown
Below its high8.7%, high on Aug 14, 20266.3%, high on Sep 22, 2021
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI EMU IndexMarkit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.50%0.14%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$9.2bn$30.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund30.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EZU and LQD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EZU LQD
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EZU
ASML HOLDING 8.79%
SAP 3.33%
SIEMENS N AG 2.97%
ALLIANZ 2.55%
BANCO SANTANDER 2.48%
TOTALENERGIES 2.48%
IBERDROLA 2.10%
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC 2.05%
Only in LQD
ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES LLC 0.20%
CVS HEALTH CORP 0.17%
SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES COR 144A 0.16%
T-MOBILE USA INC 0.16%
AMAZON.COM INC 0.14%
BOEING CO 0.14%
CITIGROUP INC 0.14%
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC 0.14%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EZU iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI Eurozone Tracks an index of US investment grade bonds
Total return, 1 year +7.1% −3.4%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.3% (ACWX) −1.2% (IUSB)
Gap to its benchmark −7.2 pts vs ACWX −2.2 pts vs IUSB
Expense ratio 0.50% 0.14%
Holdings 216 3191
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $9.2bn $30.6bn

EZU and LQD on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

EZU and LQD flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EZU

EZU tracks the MSCI Eurozone. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 216 positions, with the top ten at 30.5%. It sat 8.7% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

LQD

LQD tracks an index of US investment grade bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −3.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year. It sat 6.3% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EZU or LQD?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EZU returned +7.1% and LQD −3.4%.
Which is cheaper, EZU or LQD?
LQD is cheaper, by 0.36 percentage points a year. That is about $36 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EZU against LQD, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ezu-vs-lqd

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.