Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EZU vs IGM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EZU returned +7.1% to IGM's +21.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EZU and IGM

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $9.2bn for iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF and $11.0bn for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF.

At a glance
+7.1%
EZU total return, 1 year
+21.7%
IGM total return, 1 year
0.50%
EZU expense ratio
0.37%
IGM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IGM costs 0.13 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.6 points; IGM is 1.2 times larger.

EZU vs IGM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEZUIGM
Return
Total return, 1 year+7.1%+21.7%
Drawdown
Below its high8.7%, high on Aug 14, 20266.2%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI EMU IndexS&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.50%0.37%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$9.2bn$11.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund30.5%56.8%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EZU and IGM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EZU IGM
LAIR LIQUIDE SOCIETE ANONYME POUR 1.67% 0.01%
NN GROUP 0.31% 0.01%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EZU
ASML HOLDING 8.79%
SAP 3.33%
SIEMENS N AG 2.97%
ALLIANZ 2.55%
BANCO SANTANDER 2.48%
TOTALENERGIES 2.48%
IBERDROLA 2.10%
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC 2.05%
Only in IGM
APPLE 9.36%
MICROSOFT 9.19%
NVIDIA 8.28%
BROADCOM INC 7.07%
ALPHABET CLASS A 4.57%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 4.27%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 4.16%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 4.07%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EZU iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI Eurozone Tracks an index of Expanded Tech Sector
Total return, 1 year +7.1% +21.7%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.3% (ACWX) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −7.2 pts vs ACWX not measured
Expense ratio 0.50% 0.37%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 91.9%
Holdings 216 295
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $9.2bn $11.0bn

EZU and IGM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

EZU and IGM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EZU

EZU tracks the MSCI Eurozone. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 216 positions, with the top ten at 30.5%. It sat 8.7% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

IGM

IGM tracks an index of Expanded Tech Sector. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +21.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 295 positions, with the top ten at 56.8%. It sat 6.2% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EZU or IGM?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EZU returned +7.1% and IGM +21.7%.
Which is cheaper, EZU or IGM?
IGM is cheaper, by 0.13 percentage points a year. That is about $13 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EZU and IGM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EZU and 92% of IGM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EZU against IGM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ezu-vs-igm

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.