Which returned more over the last year, EWZ or PULS?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWZ returned +32.9% and PULS returned +4.2%, so EWZ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, EWZ or PULS?

EWZ charges 0.59% a year and PULS charges 0.15%, so PULS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EWZ vs PULS: how they differ

EWZ and PULS hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EWZ returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI Brazil ETF and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EWZ and PULS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EWZ	Only in PULS
CIA VALE DO RIO DOCE SH 9.71%	PGIM ETF Trust 2.38%
NU HOLDINGS CLASS A 9.13%	GLENCORE FUNDING LLC 0.98%
ITAU UNIBANCO HOLDING PREF SA 7.83%	Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0.87%
PETROLEO BRASILEIRO PREF SA 7.30%	ABN AMRO BANK NV 0.75%
PETROLEO BRASILEIRO SA PETROBRAS 6.86%	BX TRUST 2022-LBA6 0.68%
BANCO BRADESCO PREF 3.70%	FEDERATION DES CAISSES DESJARDINS DU QUE 0.67%
B3 BRASIL BOLSA BALCAO SA 3.48%	BX TRUST 2018-BILT 0.56%
WEG 3.28%	BROADCOM INC 0.56%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

EWZ and PULS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	EWZ iShares MSCI Brazil ETF	PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	PGIM
What it is	MSCI Brazil	PGIM Ultra Short Bond
Total return, 1 year	+32.9%	+4.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+15.4 pts	−13.3 pts
Expense ratio	0.59%	0.15%
Holdings	50	553

EWZ in plain words

EWZ is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Brazil. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 50 positions, with the top ten at 57.1%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Apr 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

PULS in plain words

PULS is a cash and treasury bills tracking the PGIM Ultra Short Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWZ or PULS?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWZ returned +32.9% and PULS returned +4.2%, so EWZ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EWZ or PULS?: EWZ charges 0.59% a year and PULS charges 0.15%, so PULS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EWZ against PULS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EWZ against PULS, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewz-vs-puls Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources