Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

PULS vs VPL: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PULS returned +4.0% to VPL's +24.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about PULS and VPL

Net assets: $19.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF, and $9.0bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF.

At a glance
+4.0%
PULS total return, 1 year
+24.8%
VPL total return, 1 year
0.15%
PULS expense ratio
0.07%
VPL expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VPL costs 0.08 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 20.8 points.

PULS vs VPL: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePULSVPL
Return
Total return, 1 year+4.0%+24.8%
Drawdown
Below its high7.2%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedFTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.07%
Net assets, PULS as of Oct 27, 2026 and VPL as of Sep 30, 2026$19.8bn$9.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund24.8%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 20, 2018 to Oct 23, 2026 · 444 weekly returns
PULS VPL
Return
Total return edge VPL +32.2% +89.2%
Annualized edge VPL +3.3% +7.8%
Price return edge VPL −0.9% +49.0%
Risk
Volatility edge PULS 1.9% 17.9%
Max drawdown edge PULS −5.9% −30.4%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge VPL 0.27 0.35
Sortino edge VPL 0.32 0.50
Calmar edge PULS 0.57 0.26
Reading

VPL returned more: +89.2% to +32.2%. PULS swung less: 1.9% to 17.9%. PULS fell less at its worst: −5.9% to −30.4%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: PULS vs VPL: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePULSVPLEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+32.2%+89.2%VPLPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+3.3%+7.8%VPLTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−0.9%+49.0%VPLPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility1.9%17.9%PULSSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation1.6%12.6%PULSLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−5.9%−30.4%PULSDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.270.35VPLReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.320.50VPLReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.570.26PULSAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 444 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, PULS and VPL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first PULS VPL
Only in one fund ↓
Only in PULS
PGIM ETF Trust 1.81%
GLENCORE FUNDING LLC 0.74%
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0.66%
ABN AMRO BANK NV 0.57%
BX TRUST 2022-LBA6 0.51%
FEDERATION DES CAISSES DESJARDINS DU QUEBEC 0.51%
BX TRUST 2018-BILT 0.43%
BROADCOM INC 0.43%
Only in VPL
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 7.11%
SK hynix Inc 5.82%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc 1.98%
BHP Group Ltd 1.69%
SLBBH1142 1.57%
Toyota Motor Corp 1.51%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia 1.37%
Tokyo Electron Ltd 1.30%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF VPL Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
Issuer PGIM Vanguard
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Pacific Stock
Total return, 1 year +4.0% +24.8%
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.07%
Holdings 553 2343
Net assets, PULS as of Oct 27, 2026 and VPL as of Sep 30, 2026 $19.8bn $9.0bn

PULS and VPL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief

No client brief for this pair: the two funds' holdings are dated 124 days apart.

Alert

PULS flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
PULS

PULS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

VPL

VPL tracks an index of Pacific Stock. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,343 positions, with the top ten at 24.8%. It sat 7.2% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PULS or VPL?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PULS returned +4.0% and VPL +24.8%.
Which is cheaper, PULS or VPL?
VPL is cheaper, by 0.08 percentage points a year. That is about $8 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PULS against VPL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/puls-vs-vpl

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.