Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EWY vs VGT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EWY returned +79.7% to VGT's +24.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EWY and VGT

Net assets: $24.4bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF, and $154.5bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Information Tech ETF.

At a glance
+79.7%
EWY total return, 1 year
+24.7%
VGT total return, 1 year
0.59%
EWY expense ratio
0.09%
VGT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VGT costs 0.50 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 55.0 points; VGT is 5.9 times larger.

EWY vs VGT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWYVGT
Return
Total return, 1 year+79.7%+24.7%
Drawdown
Below its high24.3%, high on Jun 18, 20264.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Korea 25/50 Daily 25 Capped IndexMSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.59%0.09%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$26.2bn$154.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund60.9%63.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Feb 6, 2004 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,185 weekly returns
EWY VGT
Return
Total return edge VGT +663.2% +2,280.1%
Annualized edge VGT +9.3% +14.9%
Price return edge VGT +457.3% +1,863.7%
Risk
Volatility edge VGT 29.2% 21.2%
Max drawdown edge VGT −70.1% −52.4%
Downside capture 103.2% 99.9%
Beta 1.08 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge VGT 0.39 0.68
Sortino edge VGT 0.57 0.99
Treynor 0.124 0.201
Calmar edge VGT 0.13 0.28
Against the benchmark
Alpha +2.5% a year +0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.83 0.80
Information ratio 0.22 0.19
Tracking error 14.8% 0.7%

Each against its own benchmark: EWY against EEM, Apr 25, 2003 to Oct 23, 2026; VGT against FTEC, Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

VGT returned more: +2,280.1% to +663.2%. VGT swung less: 21.2% to 29.2%. VGT fell less at its worst: −52.4% to −70.1%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: EWY vs VGT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWYVGTEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+663.2%+2,280.1%VGTPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+9.3%+14.9%VGTTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+457.3%+1,863.7%VGTPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility29.2%21.2%VGTSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation20.1%14.4%VGTLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−70.1%−52.4%VGTDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture115.0%100.0%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture103.2%99.9%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.081.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.741.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.390.68VGTReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.570.99VGTReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1240.201Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.130.28VGTAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkEEMFTECThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+2.5% a year+0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.830.80Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−3.4% to +8.5%−0.2% to +0.5%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.220.19Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error14.8%0.7%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,185 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EWY and VGT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EWY VGT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EWY
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 23.14%
SK HYNIX 23.11%
SK SQUARE 2.78%
SAMSUNG ELECTRO MECHANICS LTD 2.67%
KB FINANCIAL GROUP 2.06%
SHINHAN FINANCIAL GROUP 1.54%
HYUNDAI MOTOR 1.51%
HANA FINANCIAL GROUP 1.39%
Only in VGT
NVIDIA Corp 17.58%
Apple Inc 15.91%
Microsoft Corp 11.16%
Micron Technology Inc 4.45%
Broadcom Inc 4.11%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.67%
Intel Corp 1.98%
Cisco Systems Inc 1.60%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF VGT Vanguard Information Tech ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI South Korea Tracks an index of Information technology
Total return, 1 year +79.7% +24.7%
Its benchmark over the same days +16.3% (EEM) +25.0% (FTEC)
Gap to its benchmark +63.4 pts vs EEM −0.3 pts vs FTEC
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.09%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 86.8%
Holdings 78 320
Net assets, EWY as of Oct 28, 2026 and VGT as of Sep 30, 2026 $24.4bn $154.5bn

EWY and VGT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-736A4074AC

EWY and VGT do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. EWY follows MSCI Korea 25/50 Daily 25 Capped Index and VGT follows MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 EWY returned +79.7% and VGT +24.7% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 55.0 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

EWY flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EWY

EWY tracks the MSCI South Korea. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +79.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 60.9%. It sat 24.3% below its high of Jun 18, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VGT

VGT tracks an index of Information technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.7% with distributions reinvested, against +25.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 320 positions, with the top ten at 63.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWY or VGT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWY returned +79.7% and VGT +24.7%.
Which is cheaper, EWY or VGT?
VGT is cheaper, by 0.50 percentage points a year. That is about $50 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EWY and VGT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EWY and 87% of VGT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EWY against VGT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewy-vs-vgt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.