Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EWY vs FTEC: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EWY returned +79.7% to FTEC's +25.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EWY and FTEC

Net assets: $24.4bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF, and $22.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF.

At a glance
+79.7%
EWY total return, 1 year
+25.0%
FTEC total return, 1 year
0.59%
EWY expense ratio
0.08%
FTEC expense ratio

Pair scorecard

FTEC costs 0.51 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 54.7 points; EWY is 1.2 times larger.

EWY vs FTEC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWYFTEC
Return
Total return, 1 year+79.7%+25.0%
Drawdown
Below its high24.3%, high on Jun 18, 20264.9%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Korea 25/50 Daily 25 Capped IndexMSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.59%0.08%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$26.2bn$22.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund60.9%62.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026 · 677 weekly returns
EWY FTEC
Return
Total return edge FTEC +198.5% +1,178.5%
Annualized edge FTEC +8.8% +21.6%
Price return edge FTEC +135.1% +1,031.1%
Risk
Volatility edge FTEC 26.5% 21.3%
Max drawdown edge FTEC −49.7% −34.1%
Downside capture 103.2% 100.0%
Beta 1.08 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge FTEC 0.38 0.94
Sortino edge FTEC 0.55 1.41
Treynor 0.124 0.199
Calmar edge FTEC 0.18 0.63
Against the benchmark
Alpha +2.5% a year −0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.83 −0.70
Information ratio 0.22 −0.19
Tracking error 14.8% 0.7%

Each against its own benchmark: EWY against EEM, Apr 25, 2003 to Oct 23, 2026; FTEC against VGT, Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

FTEC returned more: +1,178.5% to +198.5%. FTEC swung less: 21.3% to 26.5%. FTEC fell less at its worst: −34.1% to −49.7%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: EWY vs FTEC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWYFTECEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+198.5%+1,178.5%FTECPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+8.8%+21.6%FTECTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+135.1%+1,031.1%FTECPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility26.5%21.3%FTECSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation18.1%14.1%FTECLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−49.7%−34.1%FTECDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture115.0%99.7%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture103.2%100.0%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.081.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.741.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.380.94FTECReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.551.41FTECReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1240.199Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.180.63FTECAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkEEMVGTThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+2.5% a year−0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.83−0.70Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−3.4% to +8.5%−0.5% to +0.2%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.22−0.19Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error14.8%0.7%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 677 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EWY and FTEC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EWY FTEC
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EWY
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 23.14%
SK HYNIX 23.11%
SK SQUARE 2.78%
SAMSUNG ELECTRO MECHANICS LTD 2.67%
KB FINANCIAL GROUP 2.06%
SHINHAN FINANCIAL GROUP 1.54%
HYUNDAI MOTOR 1.51%
HANA FINANCIAL GROUP 1.39%
Only in FTEC
NVIDIA Corp 17.09%
Apple Inc 16.21%
Microsoft Corp 10.93%
Broadcom Inc 4.20%
Micron Technology Inc 3.82%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.18%
Cisco Systems Inc 1.92%
Applied Materials Inc 1.69%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI South Korea Tracks the MSCI Information Technology
Total return, 1 year +79.7% +25.0%
Its benchmark over the same days +16.3% (EEM) +24.7% (VGT)
Gap to its benchmark +63.4 pts vs EEM +0.3 pts vs VGT
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.08%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 87.8%
Holdings 78 281
Net assets, EWY as of Oct 28, 2026 and FTEC as of Sep 30, 2026 $24.4bn $22.1bn

EWY and FTEC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-F87A54642C

EWY and FTEC do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. EWY follows MSCI Korea 25/50 Daily 25 Capped Index and FTEC follows MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 EWY returned +79.7% and FTEC +25.0% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 54.7 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

EWY flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EWY

EWY tracks the MSCI South Korea. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +79.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 60.9%. It sat 24.3% below its high of Jun 18, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

FTEC

FTEC tracks the MSCI Information Technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +25.0% with distributions reinvested, against +24.7% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 281 positions, with the top ten at 62.2%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWY or FTEC?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWY returned +79.7% and FTEC +25.0%.
Which is cheaper, EWY or FTEC?
FTEC is cheaper, by 0.51 percentage points a year. That is about $51 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EWY and FTEC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EWY and 88% of FTEC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EWY against FTEC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewy-vs-ftec

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.