Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EWY vs VGLT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EWY returned +79.7% to VGLT's −6.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EWY and VGLT

Net assets: $24.4bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF, and $10.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF.

At a glance
+79.7%
EWY total return, 1 year
−6.7%
VGLT total return, 1 year
0.59%
EWY expense ratio
0.03%
VGLT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VGLT costs 0.56 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 86.4 points; EWY is 2.5 times larger.

EWY vs VGLT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWYVGLT
Return
Total return, 1 year+79.7%−6.7%
Drawdown
Below its high24.3%, high on Jun 18, 202638.8%, high on Aug 4, 2020
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Korea 25/50 Daily 25 Capped IndexBloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.59%0.03%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$26.2bn$10.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund60.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EWY and VGLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EWY VGLT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EWY
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 23.14%
SK HYNIX 23.11%
SK SQUARE 2.78%
SAMSUNG ELECTRO MECHANICS LTD 2.67%
KB FINANCIAL GROUP 2.06%
SHINHAN FINANCIAL GROUP 1.54%
HYUNDAI MOTOR 1.51%
HANA FINANCIAL GROUP 1.39%
Only in VGLT
United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.19%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.13%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.13%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.10%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.08%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.08%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.07%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.05%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF VGLT Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI South Korea Tracks an index of Long-term Treasury
Total return, 1 year +79.7% −6.7%
Its benchmark over the same days +16.3% (EEM) −6.7% (SCHQ)
Gap to its benchmark +63.4 pts vs EEM 0.0 pts vs SCHQ
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.03%
Holdings 78 102
Net assets, EWY as of Oct 28, 2026 and VGLT as of Sep 30, 2026 $24.4bn $10.4bn

EWY and VGLT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

EWY flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EWY

EWY tracks the MSCI South Korea. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +79.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 60.9%. It sat 24.3% below its high of Jun 18, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VGLT

VGLT tracks an index of Long-term Treasury. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −6.7% with distributions reinvested, against −6.7% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 38.8% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWY or VGLT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWY returned +79.7% and VGLT −6.7%.
Which is cheaper, EWY or VGLT?
VGLT is cheaper, by 0.56 percentage points a year. That is about $56 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EWY against VGLT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewy-vs-vglt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.