Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EWY vs VCLT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EWY returned +79.7% to VCLT's −5.9%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EWY and VCLT

Net assets: $24.4bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF, and $7.5bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF.

At a glance
+79.7%
EWY total return, 1 year
−5.9%
VCLT total return, 1 year
0.59%
EWY expense ratio
0.03%
VCLT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VCLT costs 0.56 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 85.6 points; EWY is 3.5 times larger.

EWY vs VCLT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWYVCLT
Return
Total return, 1 year+79.7%−5.9%
Drawdown
Below its high24.3%, high on Jun 18, 202617.8%, high on Sep 22, 2021
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Korea 25/50 Daily 25 Capped IndexBloomberg U.S. 10+ Year Corporate Bond Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.59%0.03%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$26.2bn$7.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund60.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EWY and VCLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EWY VCLT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EWY
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 23.14%
SK HYNIX 23.11%
SK SQUARE 2.78%
SAMSUNG ELECTRO MECHANICS LTD 2.67%
KB FINANCIAL GROUP 2.06%
SHINHAN FINANCIAL GROUP 1.54%
HYUNDAI MOTOR 1.51%
HANA FINANCIAL GROUP 1.39%
Only in VCLT
MKTLIQ 1.03%
Anheuser-Busch Cos LLC / Anheuser-Busch InBev Worldwide Inc 0.37%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.36%
CVS Health Corp 0.33%
Boeing Co 0.27%
Meta Platforms Inc 0.27%
AT&T Inc 0.24%
AT&T Inc 0.24%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF VCLT Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI South Korea Tracks an index of Long-Term Corporate Bond
Total return, 1 year +79.7% −5.9%
Its benchmark over the same days +16.3% (EEM) not measured
Gap to its benchmark +63.4 pts vs EEM not measured
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.03%
Holdings 78 2562
Net assets, EWY as of Oct 28, 2026 and VCLT as of Sep 30, 2026 $24.4bn $7.5bn

EWY and VCLT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

EWY flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EWY

EWY tracks the MSCI South Korea. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +79.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 60.9%. It sat 24.3% below its high of Jun 18, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VCLT

VCLT tracks an index of Long-Term Corporate Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −5.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 17.8% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWY or VCLT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWY returned +79.7% and VCLT −5.9%.
Which is cheaper, EWY or VCLT?
VCLT is cheaper, by 0.56 percentage points a year. That is about $56 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EWY against VCLT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewy-vs-vclt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.