Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EWY vs TIP: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EWY returned +79.7% to TIP's −1.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EWY and TIP

Net assets: $24.4bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF, and $14.6bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares TIPS Bond ETF.

At a glance
+79.7%
EWY total return, 1 year
−1.0%
TIP total return, 1 year
0.59%
EWY expense ratio
0.18%
TIP expense ratio

Pair scorecard

TIP costs 0.41 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 80.7 points; EWY is 1.5 times larger.

EWY vs TIP: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWYTIP
Return
Total return, 1 year+79.7%−1.0%
Drawdown
Below its high24.3%, high on Jun 18, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Korea 25/50 Daily 25 Capped IndexICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.59%0.18%
Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026$22.5bn$14.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund60.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EWY and TIP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EWY TIP
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EWY
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 23.14%
SK HYNIX 23.11%
SK SQUARE 2.78%
SAMSUNG ELECTRO MECHANICS LTD 2.67%
KB FINANCIAL GROUP 2.06%
SHINHAN FINANCIAL GROUP 1.54%
HYUNDAI MOTOR 1.51%
HANA FINANCIAL GROUP 1.39%
Only in TIP
TREASURY (CPI) NOTE 4.07%
TREASURY (CPI) NOTE 4.00%
TREASURY (CPI) NOTE 3.99%
TREASURY (CPI) NOTE 3.75%
TREASURY (CPI) NOTE 3.44%
TREASURY (CPI) NOTE 3.38%
TREASURY (CPI) NOTE 3.38%
TREASURY (CPI) NOTE 3.27%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF TIP iShares TIPS Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI South Korea Tracks an index of TIPS Bond
Total return, 1 year +79.7% −1.0%
Its benchmark over the same days +16.3% (EEM) −0.8% (VTP)
Gap to its benchmark +63.4 pts vs EEM −0.2 pts vs VTP
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.18%
Holdings 78 48
Net assets, EWY as of Oct 28, 2026 and TIP as of Oct 27, 2026 $24.4bn $14.6bn

EWY and TIP on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

EWY and TIP flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EWY

EWY tracks the MSCI South Korea. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +79.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 60.9%. It sat 24.3% below its high of Jun 18, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

TIP

TIP tracks an index of TIPS Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.0% with distributions reinvested, against −0.8% for its benchmark, the ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWY or TIP?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWY returned +79.7% and TIP −1.0%.
Which is cheaper, EWY or TIP?
TIP is cheaper, by 0.41 percentage points a year. That is about $41 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EWY against TIP, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewy-vs-tip

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.