Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EMB vs EWY: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EMB returned −0.4% to EWY's +79.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EMB and EWY

Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $13.2bn for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF and $24.4bn for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF.

At a glance
−0.4%
EMB total return, 1 year
+79.7%
EWY total return, 1 year
0.39%
EMB expense ratio
0.59%
EWY expense ratio

Pair scorecard

EMB costs 0.20 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 80.1 points; EWY is 1.8 times larger.

EMB vs EWY: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEMBEWY
Return
Total return, 1 year−0.4%+79.7%
Drawdown
Below its high3.5%, high on Jun 29, 202624.3%, high on Jun 18, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksJ.P. Morgan EMBI Global Core IndexMSCI Korea 25/50 Daily 25 Capped Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.39%0.59%
Net assets$13.2bn$24.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund60.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EMB and EWY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EMB EWY
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EMB
ARGENTINA REPUBLIC OF GOVERNMENT 1.08%
ECUADOR REPUBLIC OF (GOVERNMENT) RegS 0.76%
ARGENTINA REPUBLIC OF GOVERNMENT 0.65%
ARGENTINA REPUBLIC OF GOVERNMENT 0.64%
GHANA (REPUBLIC OF) DISCO RegS 0.56%
URUGUAY (ORIENTAL REPUBLIC OF) 0.54%
ARGENTINA REPUBLIC OF GOVERNMENT 0.52%
EAGLE FUNDING LUXCO SARL RegS 0.52%
Only in EWY
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 23.14%
SK HYNIX 23.11%
SK SQUARE 2.78%
SAMSUNG ELECTRO MECHANICS LTD 2.67%
KB FINANCIAL GROUP 2.06%
SHINHAN FINANCIAL GROUP 1.54%
HYUNDAI MOTOR 1.51%
HANA FINANCIAL GROUP 1.39%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond Tracks the MSCI South Korea
Total return, 1 year −0.4% +79.7%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +16.3% (EEM)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +63.4 pts vs EEM
Expense ratio 0.39% 0.59%
Holdings 622 78
Net assets $13.2bn $24.4bn

EMB and EWY on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

EMB and EWY flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EMB

EMB tracks the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. It sat 3.5% below its high of Jun 29, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

EWY

EWY tracks the MSCI South Korea. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +79.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 60.9%. It sat 24.3% below its high of Jun 18, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EMB or EWY?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned −0.4% and EWY +79.7%.
Which is cheaper, EMB or EWY?
EMB is cheaper, by 0.20 percentage points a year. That is about $20 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EMB against EWY, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emb-vs-ewy

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.