Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EWY vs IJS: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EWY returned +79.7% to IJS's +19.3%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EWY and IJS

Net assets: $24.4bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF, and $7.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF.

At a glance
+79.7%
EWY total return, 1 year
+19.3%
IJS total return, 1 year
0.59%
EWY expense ratio
0.18%
IJS expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IJS costs 0.41 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 60.4 points; EWY is 2.9 times larger.

EWY vs IJS: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWYIJS
Return
Total return, 1 year+79.7%+19.3%
Drawdown
Below its high24.3%, high on Jun 18, 20265.7%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Korea 25/50 Daily 25 Capped IndexS&P SmallCap 600 Value Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.59%0.18%
Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026$22.5bn$7.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund60.9%8.8%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Aug 4, 2000 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,368 weekly returns
EWY IJS
Return
Total return edge Tie +1,030.9% +1,010.8%
Annualized edge Tie +9.7% +9.6%
Price return edge EWY (slight) +711.9% +662.6%
Risk
Volatility edge IJS 30.5% 22.7%
Max drawdown edge IJS −70.1% −59.4%
Downside capture 103.2% 100.4%
Beta 1.08 0.99
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge IJS (slight) 0.40 0.44
Sortino edge IJS (slight) 0.58 0.64
Treynor 0.124 0.102
Calmar edge IJS 0.14 0.16
Against the benchmark
Alpha +2.5% a year −0.6% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.83 −0.58
Information ratio 0.22 −0.14
Tracking error 14.8% 5.1%

Each against its own benchmark: EWY against EEM, Apr 25, 2003 to Oct 23, 2026; IJS against SLYV, Oct 13, 2000 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

EWY and IJS returned about the same: +1,030.9% and +1,010.8%. IJS swung less: 22.7% to 30.5%. IJS fell less at its worst: −59.4% to −70.1%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: EWY vs IJS: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWYIJSEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+1,030.9%+1,010.8%TiePrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+9.7%+9.6%TieTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+711.9%+662.6%EWY (slight)Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility30.5%22.7%IJSSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation20.9%15.7%IJSLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−70.1%−59.4%IJSDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture115.0%98.3%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture103.2%100.4%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.080.99Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.740.95Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.400.44IJS (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.580.64IJS (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1240.102Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.140.16IJSAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkEEMSLYVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+2.5% a year−0.6% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.83−0.58Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−3.4% to +8.5%−2.5% to +1.4%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.22−0.14Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error14.8%5.1%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,368 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EWY and IJS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EWY IJS
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EWY
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 23.14%
SK HYNIX 23.11%
SK SQUARE 2.78%
SAMSUNG ELECTRO MECHANICS LTD 2.67%
KB FINANCIAL GROUP 2.06%
SHINHAN FINANCIAL GROUP 1.54%
HYUNDAI MOTOR 1.51%
HANA FINANCIAL GROUP 1.39%
Only in IJS
PAYCOM SOFTWARE 1.09%
MATCH GROUP INC 1.08%
SM ENERGY 1.00%
JACKSON FINANCIAL CLASS A 0.91%
CARMAX INC 0.82%
EASTMAN CHEMICAL 0.81%
LAMB WESTON HOLDINGS 0.80%
VICTORIA S SECRET 0.79%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF IJS iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI South Korea Tracks the S&P Small-Cap 600 Value
Total return, 1 year +79.7% +19.3%
Its benchmark over the same days +16.3% (EEM) +19.2% (SLYV)
Gap to its benchmark +63.4 pts vs EEM +0.1 pts vs SLYV
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.18%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 78 477
Net assets, EWY as of Oct 28, 2026 and IJS as of Oct 27, 2026 $24.4bn $7.7bn

EWY and IJS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-C95951461C

EWY and IJS do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. EWY follows MSCI Korea 25/50 Daily 25 Capped Index and IJS follows S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 EWY returned +79.7% and IJS +19.3% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 60.4 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

EWY and IJS flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EWY

EWY tracks the MSCI South Korea. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +79.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 60.9%. It sat 24.3% below its high of Jun 18, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

IJS

IJS tracks the S&P Small-Cap 600 Value. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +19.3% with distributions reinvested, against +19.2% for its benchmark, the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 477 positions, with the top ten at 8.8%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWY or IJS?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWY returned +79.7% and IJS +19.3%.
Which is cheaper, EWY or IJS?
IJS is cheaper, by 0.41 percentage points a year. That is about $41 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EWY and IJS overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EWY and 0% of IJS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EWY against IJS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewy-vs-ijs

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.