Which returned more over the last year, EWT or XLP?

In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWT returned +69.9% and XLP +13.8%.

Which is cheaper, EWT or XLP?

XLP is cheaper, by 0.51 percentage points a year. That is about $51 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

How much do EWT and XLP overlap with the S&P 500?

By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EWT and 100% of XLP by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Across categories

EWT vs XLP: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EWT returned +69.9% to XLP's +13.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EWT and XLP

Net assets: $12.0bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF, and $14.6bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF.

EWT on its own →XLP on its own →

At a glance

+69.9%

EWT total return, 1 year

+13.8%

XLP total return, 1 year

0.59%

EWT expense ratio

0.08%

XLP expense ratio

Pair scorecard

XLP costs 0.51 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 56.1 points; XLP is 1.2 times larger.

EWT vs XLP: Differences, Returns & Fees
Measure	EWT	XLP
Return
Measure	EWT	XLP
Total return, 1 year	+69.9%	+13.8%
Drawdown
Measure	EWT	XLP
Below its high	7.7%, high on Oct 5, 2026	3.5%, high on Oct 22, 2026
Benchmark
Measure	EWT	XLP
What it tracks	MSCI Taiwan 25/50 Index	Consumer Staples Select Sector Index
Cost and size
Measure	EWT	XLP
Expense ratio	0.59%	0.08%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026	$11.8bn	$14.6bn
Holdings
Measure	EWT	XLP
Holdings in common	0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund	47.7%	62.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, EWT and XLP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EWT XLP

Only in one fund ↓

Only in EWT

TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 22.12%

MEDIATEK 6.03%

HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY 3.31%

DELTA ELECTRONICS 3.25%

ASE TECHNOLOGY HOLDING 2.86%

NAN YA PLASTICS CORP 2.54%

UNIMICRON TECHNOLOGY 2.04%

ELITE MATERIAL 1.88%

Only in XLP

WALMART INC 11.05%

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP 9.14%

PROCTER + GAMBLE CO 7.69%

COCA COLA CO 7.34%

PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL 6.56%

ALTRIA GROUP INC 4.54%

COLGATE PALMOLIVE CO 4.39%

MONDELEZ INTERNATIONAL INC A 4.19%

Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF

Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF

Issuer iShares State Street

What it is Tracks the MSCI Taiwan Tracks an index of Consumer staples

Total return, 1 year +69.9% +13.8%

Its benchmark over the same days +16.3% (EEM) not measured

Gap to its benchmark +53.6 pts vs EEM not measured

Expense ratio 0.59% 0.08%

Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 99.6%

Holdings 79 36

Net assets, EWT as of Oct 28, 2026 and XLP as of Oct 27, 2026 $12.0bn $14.6bn

EWT and XLP on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

About each fund

EWT

EWT tracks the MSCI Taiwan. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +69.9% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 79 positions, with the top ten at 47.7%. It sat 7.7% below its high of Oct 5, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

XLP

XLP tracks an index of Consumer staples. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 36 positions, with the top ten at 62.9%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Oct 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWT or XLP?: In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWT returned +69.9% and XLP +13.8%.
Which is cheaper, EWT or XLP?: XLP is cheaper, by 0.51 percentage points a year. That is about $51 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EWT and XLP overlap with the S&P 500?: By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EWT and 100% of XLP by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Other comparisons

EWT vs VDC EWT vs XLB EWT vs XHB EWT vs XRT FXI vs XLP INDA vs XLP ILF vs XLP FLKR vs XLP

Where to next

EWT on its own →XLP on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →EWT dividend history →EWT holdings →XLP dividend history →XLP holdings →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

EWT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

EWT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

iShares page for EWT ↗

XLP filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

XLP prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

State Street website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EWT against XLP, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewt-vs-xlp

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.