Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
EWT vs XLB: how they differ
EWT and XLB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EWT returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF and State Street(R) Materials Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, EWT and XLB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in EWT | Only in XLB |
|---|---|
| TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 22.07% | LINDE PLC 12.91% |
| MEDIATEK 7.03% | NEWMONT CORP 8.14% |
| DELTA ELECTRONICS 3.53% | FREEPORT MCMORAN INC 6.19% |
| HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY 3.28% | CORTEVA INC 5.11% |
| ASE TECHNOLOGY HOLDING 2.79% | AIR PRODUCTS + CHEMICALS INC 4.78% |
| UNITED MICRO ELECTRONICS CORP 2.09% | ECOLAB INC 4.75% |
| ELITE MATERIAL 2.08% | SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO/THE 4.70% |
| NAN YA PLASTICS CORP 2.04% | NUCOR CORP 4.59% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | XLB State Street(R) Materials Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | State Street |
| What it is | MSCI Taiwan | Materials |
| Total return, 1 year | +84.9% | +12.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +67.4 pts | −5.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.59% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 78 | 27 |
EWT in plain words
EWT is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +84.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 48.6%.
XLB in plain words
XLB is an index equity fund tracking the Materials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 27 positions, with the top ten at 59.4%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 26, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EWT or XLB?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWT returned +84.9% and XLB returned +12.0%, so EWT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, EWT or XLB?
- EWT charges 0.59% a year and XLB charges 0.08%, so XLB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do EWT and XLB overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EWT and 100% of XLB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, EWT against XLB, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewt-vs-xlb Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources