ESGD vs IDEQ: Differences, Returns & Fees

ESGD and IDEQ hold 21% of their weight in the same names, and IDEQ returned +23.0% over the year. Net assets: $11.8bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF, and $1.5bn on Jun 30, 2026 for Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF.

ESGD costs 0.20 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.6 points.

ESGDIDEQ
Expense ratio0.20%0.40%
Net assets, ESGD as of Oct 9, 2026 and IDEQ as of Jun 30, 2026$11.8bn$1.5bn
Total return, 1 year+13.4%+23.0%
What it tracksnot read by ETFIQNo index, actively managed
Holdings in common21%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund14.2%25.8%
Below its high4.9%, high on Aug 13, 20264.2%, high on Sep 4, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+13.4%
ESGD total return, 1 year
+23.0%
IDEQ total return, 1 year
0.20%
ESGD expense ratio
0.40%
IDEQ expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ESGD and IDEQ hold 21% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

21% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding ESGD IDEQ
ASML HOLDING 3.49% 3.44%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 0.98% 1.19%
ABB LTD 1.06% 0.93%
BNP PARIBAS SA 0.73% 2.01%
ADVANTEST 0.86% 0.71%
NOVARTIS AG 1.45% 0.68%
ROLLS-ROYCE HOLDINGS PLC 0.64% 0.99%
SUMITOMO MITSUI FINANCIAL GROUP 0.86% 0.62%
BANCO BILBAO VIZCAYA ARGENTARIA SA 0.63% 0.59%
SONY GROUP 0.83% 0.57%
BANCO SANTANDER 0.57% 1.68%
TOKYO ELECTRON 0.97% 0.54%
Only in ESGD
SAP 1.22%
ROCHE PS PAR AG 1.17%
SIEMENS N AG 1.15%
NESTLE SA 1.03%
ALLIANZ 1.01%
TOYOTA MOTOR 0.99%
COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA 0.96%
INTESA SANPAOLO 0.96%
Only in IDEQ
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 5.08%
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 3.56%
SK hynix Inc 2.72%
Vinci SA 2.07%
GSK PLC 1.80%
Japan Post Holdings Co Ltd 1.69%
Legal & General Group PLC 1.34%
Barrick Mining Corp 1.34%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

ESGD
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF
IDEQ
Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +13.4% +23.0%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 −3.9 pts +5.7 pts
Expense ratio 0.20% 0.40%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 337 249
Net assets, ESGD as of Oct 9, 2026 and IDEQ as of Jun 30, 2026 $11.8bn $1.5bn

ESGD and IDEQ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ESGD in plain words

ESGD tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 337 positions, with the top ten at 14.2%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

IDEQ in plain words

IDEQ is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 249 positions, with the top ten at 25.8%. It sat 4.2% below its high of Sep 4, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ESGD or IDEQ?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ESGD returned +13.4% and IDEQ +23.0%.
Which is cheaper, ESGD or IDEQ?
ESGD is cheaper, by 0.20 percentage points a year. That is about $20 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ESGD and IDEQ overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of ESGD and 0% of IDEQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ESGD against IDEQ, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/esgd-vs-ideq

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.